- NZNOG - lists.nznog.org

Re: HitWise
by Bob Baal 10 Apr '02

10 Apr '02

I ran the Hitwise system at CLEARNet for several years. The system seemed to work quite well. The initial work over the logs is done on your site by a program that Hitwise provide. The output of the program is a text file that you can inspect. The format is quite simple and there are no userid's in the file just site info. So there is no privacy concerns that I can see as its not possible to identify a particular users surfing pattern. The marketing bodies seemed to be happy with the reports that they got for free. We only stopped using the system because marketing decided they preferred another crowd. However after turning off hitwise they found out the the new crowd wanted to charge us an arm and a leg for the info Hitwise had given us for free so that deal fell through and now nobody uses the CLEAR Net logs anymore........... If would have been a good idea to find that out before tuning Hitwise off d'oh........ Regards Bob At 23:49 10/04/2002 +1200, Steve Phillips wrote: >Hi, > >This word is starting to circulate about our office and I was wondering if >anyone else had any experience with this crowd, at first look it seems >like some dogey marketing rubbish that I should not let anywhere near our >network here, but because they promise you money and apparently take >"nothing confidential" management are viewing it through eyes painted with >pretty wee dollar signs.. > >http://www.hitwise.com/ is their website.. > >comments/suggestions ? > >(note, allowing anyone access to our proxy logs without a search warrant >grates at me already and will be one argument against this that I will be >raising as an issue..) > > >-- >Steve. > >- >To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz >where the body of your message reads: >unsubscribe nznog - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

maggie.automagic.org
by Joe Abley 08 Apr '02

08 Apr '02

The NZ-only BGP stats being collected on maggie.automagic.org have turned out to be less than entirely reliable, mainly due to the fact that I never came up with a good and consistent heuristic for determining whether a route corresponded to infrastructure which is in New Zealand or not. ASes which extend between countries, new transit and peering arrangements between NZ operators and those overseas, and peculiar redistribution loops and other leaks all conspired to pollute most of the data to the extent that it's not really good for much, as far as I can tell. What might be better would be to avoid the geopolitical distinction altogether, and just accept as much of a full table from everybody as possible, with open access for people who want to troubleshoot or collect the data for research, à la route-views.oregon-ix.net. Unfortunately maggie is a 45MHz SPARC Classic, maxed out with 96MB of RAM, and exposing her to the trauma of even one view of the full table would likely cause her extreme discomfort. If someone else feels like donating a router to the cause, to be used for such a purpose, I think that would be a Good Thing to have, but maggie is not that router. So, if anybody is going to be upset if the data currently published from maggie.automagic.org goes away, or stops being current, could they drop me a line off-list? Thanks, Joe [tangent: http://www.idg.net.nz/webhome.nsf/UNID/343E49013F5EBA2DCC256B9500189EB1!ope… 'When Debbie Monahan takes up her duties in mid-May the country will, for the first time, "have a person solely focused on the internet and making it work in New Zealand", says InternetNZ vice-president Rick Shera.' Maybe someone should tell Rick that making the internet work in New Zealand has precisely nothing whatsoever to do with the nz TLD. I would have been more encouraged by a statement which says "we expect the new Domain name commissioner to be a registrant-funded scapegoat for the continuing disappointment experienced by Domainz customers, and to be a focus point to pull all the ICANN-obsessed hot-air generators into small, poorly-ventilated rooms where they can be dispatched cleanly and efficiently using poison gas"] - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 1

The New Zealand Network Operators' Group - Email Address Correction
by Donald Neal 07 Apr '02

07 Apr '02

NZNOG 2002 Work is now under way towards a conference and social gathering to be held in Auckland in July 2002. Abstracts are _now_ sought from prospective speakers, with the aim that a draft timetable will appear shortly. If you wish to add your name as a possible presenter, please email nznog2002(a)pemberton.com without delay. Sorry about the earlier typo. - Donald Neal -- Donald Neal Special Operations Network Delivery Telecom New Zealand Ltd - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 1

Cisco 2511 misc
by Matthew G Brown 07 Apr '02

07 Apr '02

We just got left a spare 2511 router from a wireless POP upgrade. Its useless to me . Anyone know were we can dump these things. 35xx are all that are any good to me. Sorry for the slight OT. Best Regards Matthew G Brown B & R Holdings Matt(a)Brh.Co.Nz http://www.backupserver.co.nz http://www.brh.co.nz - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 3

The New Zealand Network Operators' Group
by Donald Neal 07 Apr '02

07 Apr '02

The New Zealand Network Operators' Group The New Zealand Network Operators' Group (NZNOG) has no king, president or formal membership. At present it consists of the subscribers to this mailing list, which anyone is free to join. NZNOG 2002 Work is now under way towards a conference and social gathering to be held in Auckland in July 2002. Abstracts are _now_ sought from prospective speakers, with the aim that a draft timetable will appear shortly. If you wish to add your name as a possible presenter, please email nznog2002(a)permberton.com without delay. Operators' Contact List See http://www.usenet.net.nz/noc/ for operational contact details for most New Zealand ISP's. These are intended for use by other network operators rather than by most customers. Auckland Peering Exchange See http://www.ape.net.nz/ for details of the Auckland Peering Exchange and those connected there. About This Mailing List This list has around 320 subscribers, a number which isn't changing much at present. You may only post to the list from an address subscribed to one of the lists described below. (Non-member postings and spam continue to be bounced in roughly equal volumes.) The NZNOG mailing list is provided through a server at The University of Waikato, and is administered by an employee of Telecom NZ Ltd. Neither of these organisations, nor the administrator, is responsible for its content. NZNOG Mailing List Acceptable Use Policy The NZNOG mailing list exists to provide a forum for the exchange of technical information and the discussion of implementation issues that require cooperation among New Zealand network service providers. In order to continue to provide a useful forum for discussion of relevant technical issues, users of the list are asked to respect the following guidelines. 1. Discussion will focus on Internet operational and technical issues. 2. Discussion related to meetings of network service providers is appropriate. 3. Discussion unrelated to these topics is not appropriate. 4. Postings to multiple mailing lists are discouraged. 5. Postings that include foul language, character assassination, and lack of respect for other participants are unacceptable. 6. Blatant product or service marketing is unacceptable. 7. Postings of a political, philosophical or legal nature are discouraged. 8. Postings to the list should be in ASCII or MIME encoded as text/plain. Attachments should not be sent to the list. To present a document, a suitable URL may be referred to. For documents of general interest, the use of proprietary file formats is discouraged. 9. Breaches of list etiquette should be dealt with privately with the offending list user, and should not result in complaints being sent to the list. 10. A person repeatedly breaching list etiquette shall receive warnings from the list administrator. A further breach after the second such warning within thirty days shall result in the offender being unsubscribed from the list. Other action may also be taken to block postings to the list by the offender. Any such unsubscription is to be immediately announced to the list. Mailing List Archives A full archive is available at http://list.waikato.ac.nz/archives/nznog/ Any message sent to the list will be archived and made available on the web automatically. Changes are not made to the archive on request, though the administrator remains happy to assist the Office of the Privacy Commissioner should any complaint be laid with that office. Subscribing to the List To subscribe to the NZNOG list, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz, where the body of the message reads subscribe nznog Digest Mailing List If you don't wish to receive postings as they are sent, you can instead subscribe to the nznog-digest mailiing list, on which all postings are sent out in a single "digest" every couple of days. Post-only Mailing List An address from which you wish to post, but which will not receive messages from the list, may be subscribed to nznog-postonly. You will presumably want to have another address subscribed to the main nznog list. Donald Neal NZNOG Mailing List Owner/Administrator/Muggins This email message is a public document. I don't speak for Telecom and they don't speak for me. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you." ============================================================================== - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Orcon Internet Prefix Lists Update..
by Craig Whitmore 07 Apr '02

07 Apr '02

Hi.. For all those peering with Orcon Internet (AS 17746) at APE please update your Filter Lists to add the following network. ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 219.88.240.0/20 le 24 Peering IP's : 192.203.154.66 AND 192.203.154.67 AS: 17746 A Full prefix list is included as attachment. Thanks Craig Whitmore Orcon Internet http://www.orcon.net.nz

1 0

VERY OT: Compaq Retailers in NZ?
by Malcolm Lockyer 06 Apr '02

06 Apr '02

Anybody know of good compaq retailers in NZ - I'm looking for a possible purchase of Compaq 1U rackmount servers new (or if anybody has any second hand in good condition). Also - anybody know of any good Cisco retailers - I'm more interested in the prices of the gear new - than actually buying the stuff at the moment - so I can plan :D. Best regards, Malcolm Lockyer -- owner/founder/managing director -= Neuron Net =- You're on the net! - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Re: Spam on the increase again
by Simon Byrnand 06 Apr '02

06 Apr '02

At 14:00 11/03/02 +1300, Richard Parry wrote: >Yep, I've definitely noticed it :) It got me annoyed enough to turn >Postfix into a mail rejecter :) Here's what I've stuck in >/etc/postfix/main.cf: >[snip] >Note that you need permit_mynetworks under the helo restrictions so that >you still accept email from Outlook Express clients and the like (if >this is your SMTP gateway for ISP customers) - OE will not present a >FQDN for itself regardless of operating system (I believe it presents >the NBT name). I think you'll find just about all end user email software does this. >I'd be curious to know what sorts of policies ISPs have within NZ, and >why. Before I put in my filters, most of my mail was spam - and this >just isn't right :) Apart from the UCE recieved recently (I too got the >"DHS Clubshop" mail) from within NZ, our local networks are really >quiet. I've been trialing orbz and ordb in the last couple of months (not related to orbs) and they've been very good. Naturally I've kept a very close eye on it, but I've only had 2 instance where genuine mail wasn't getting through that I know of - and in both cases they WERE actually open relays. I was easily able to add an exclusion for those two servers until they got off their ass and fixed their open relay. (Both did after a couple of weeks) Both also have good and fast removal policies so they're not the sort of list that once you get on you can never get off...(ala the original orbs :) When I first started using them it cut the spam by 80%, I'd hate to think what it would be now without it. >Certainly, I've been tempted to just block addresses from Asia... Most >of the spam I saw before I put in my filters was for cheap Thai sex >prostitues and whatnot. I'm just not that kind of girl :) Well 90% of the ip addresses that I found were all Korea :/ One extremely prolific spammer in case anyone is interested is 4.42.113.104, which belongs to genuity's netblock. Even after blocking them with 550 Rejects, they're constantly hammering on our server every half hour. I suspect there is fat chance about Genuity doing anything about them, I've heard they don't have a good rep when it comes to shutting down spammers...:) Regards, Simon - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

10 16

Re: OT: Old Stuff
by David Farrar 04 Apr '02

04 Apr '02

> On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 14:53, Craig Whitmore wrote: > > > Those days you could register es.co.nz (you can't now if this was not tak> en) > > (but they made rules up than you can't register domains as the 3rd level > > being the same as the 1st level domain) (Anyone know the reason for this? > > (there must be a good reason)) (I want to register nz.co.nz and us.co.nz) > > > > Your out of luck, us.co.nz and nz.co.nz are taken... I _think_ that the > restriction may have been lifted but I'm not 100% sure. The restriction was lifted by InternetNZ late last year. Don Stokes can explain far better than me why there used to be a ban on TLDs being registered at the 3rd level but basically it used to cause problems for some old servers. Data indicated that the number of people likely to still be using such old software is very limited and that as most other TLDs allowed TLD names at the third level we should follow the trend. Incidentially ICANN is moving to ban ccTLD (and country) names at the 2nd level in gTLDs because some Govts have asked for this. But that is for political not technical reasons DPF - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

4 3

Re: OT: Old Stuff
by Malcolm Lockyer 04 Apr '02

04 Apr '02

Bassically let me explain myself. I'm working with Idiots - who don't know the differnce beteen ram or ip. So - when I say "Its a router - its job is to direct network traffic" - they'll say somthing like "Whoa - they must be pretty big - isn't there only one of those in the world" and a multitude of silly questions. Don't get me wrong silly questions arn't that bad - its just when lots of ppl ask the same questions it gets really annoying. So - it would be great for me to say - this was a cisco 2501 series router, it is uesed to (we all know) - when it was new it was worth $X, and now its worth $x/100 etc. Also - let me be honest, there is a double meaning or purhaps hidden agenda behind asking for this stuff. Firstly it is NOT so that I can have a cool network (make with older tech) at home, or purhaps so that I can sell it - or anything like that. (To prove it - if I mess with something worthwile - a 2500 series router for example that doesn't work -and I make it work good - I'll happily give it back). Firstly - I like to tinker with stuff. Since I'm only 16 years old it is hard trying to get cisco gear, and people get really upset when you tell them that your going to tinker with the nice new shinny router that you've just installed. So - it would be alot of fun (And somthing to do to pass the time) just to mess with really old and/or broken hardware - not nessasarily tring to make it work - just messing. Especially so that I have a better understanding of actually how stuff does stuff - so eventually I can be a better/more effective employee. Also - remember I am asking for gear that isn't being used anyway - purhaps piled in a corner or some other equal place - left where it fell from the last upgrade or somthing. I'm not asking for 7500 series routers which arn't being used right now - or a 4000 that doesn't have enough ram etc. I mean more like some cisco alphabet soup products - or purhaps a 2500 that got droped a long way and doesn't light up at all anymore. Stuff like that. Effectivly junk! Also - my other purpose. I really like cisco stuff. Becasue they are such cool things - 'cause of how well they are constructed designed. And if nothing else - it would be cool to have a bunch of boxes with "Cisco Systems" tags on them :D. So - to just to reiterate. I don't want this stuff so that I can make it work and sell it - or have a huuge network at home. I'm doing it primarily 'cause cisco is cool, and I LOVE to mess with hardware. Anything at all would be more than muchly appreciated - and would go to a "good home" and be messed with/worked on for months to come. Thanks alot - even for your time to read this. :D On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Craig Spiers wrote: > If your only looking at the value of equipment, surely you dont actually have > to have the gear.. You only need an approx value of what its worth? > > I Personally dont think people on this list are stupid enough to hand gear > over for that reason eh.. > > > Quoting Malcolm Lockyer <hivemind(a)neuron.net.nz>: > > > Hello all, > > > > Sorry for the off topic post, and comerical nature of this post. But, I'm > > looking at doing a project about the devaluation of equipment. How > > routers/switches/hubs etc. etc. which cost $$$'s of dollars, then become > > almost worthless only a few years latter. So for the project it would be > > good to have some old gear on hand. > > > > So - I was wondering if people had old cisco switches/routers/anything, or > > any other branded equipment - thats old/broken/not relyable anymore that > > they wouldn't mind parting with. If you are in the hamilton/Auckland area, > > I'll come and get gear, or pay for shipping. I'm even happy to give a > > couple of dollars for stuff that still works okay. > > > > > > Thanks alot! - it'd be very thankful for ANYTHING. > > > > (BTW - please message me off list). --snip-- Best regards, Malcolm Lockyer -- owner/founder/managing director -= Nuron Net =- You're on the net! - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

10 11

nat routes
by mike johnson 01 Apr '02

01 Apr '02

WalkerWireless Simon Paterson, Steve Hawken Can Simon or Steve contact me urgently. Regards Mike Johnson Senior Network Engineer Connections Incorporated Limited Level 1, 282 Wakefield Street, PO Box 11 410, Wellington, New Zealand Mobile: +64 21 423 509; Fax: +64 4 801-5335; Switchboard: +64 4 801-5225 email: mikej(a)connections.net..nz <http://www.connections.net.nz/> Actrix Support Centre: 0800 ACTRIX, +64 4 801 5225 IMPORTANT: This electronic message and attachments (if any) are confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient do not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way. Please let us know by return email immediately and then destroy this message and any attachments.

1 0

Orcon Internet Prefix Lists Update..
by Craig Whitmore 01 Apr '02

01 Apr '02

Hi.. For all those peering with Orcon Internet (AS 17746) please update your Filter Lists to include the Following as below. Note we are advertising ranges from AS10022 and AS9889 as well via Orcon (AS17746) in case people are filtering via AS number as well. Peering IP's : 192.203.154.66 AND 192.203.154.67 AS: 17746 Thanks Craig Whitmore Orcon Internet http://www.orcon.net.nz ip prefix-list orcon-national description Orcon Internet National Ranges noc(a)orcon.net.nz ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 192.203.216.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.14.20.0/22 le 24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.14.217.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.27.76.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.27.140.0/22 le 24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.27.188.0/25 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.27.204.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.27.250.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.36.70.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.37.72.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.37.181.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.49.244.0/22 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.49.90.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.49.91.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.49.92.0/22 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.50.0.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.50.104.0/22 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.50.124.0/22 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.50.167.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 202.89.32.0/19 le 24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.54.12.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.54.13.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.54.56.0/21 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.54.142.0/23 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.54.148.0/22 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.55.0.0/25 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.55.5.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.55.8.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.55.12.0/22 le 24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.55.18.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.55.29.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.55.100.0/22 le 24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.55.104.0/22 le 24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.55.110.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.55.155.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.55.169.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.55.199.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.55.214.0/24 ip prefix-list orcon-national permit 210.55.230.0/24 - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Re: Frame-Relay Packet Loss
by Sahil Gupta - Net4U Limited 01 Apr '02

01 Apr '02

Funnily enough when we ping a machine of his, we seem to be jumping up and down in the ping rates. At times as low as 4ms and as high as 55ms over a direct frame.. What could it be? RAM? On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Craig Spiers wrote: > If he pings www.net4u.co.nz and gets no packet loss, his circuit is fine.. > > If he pings www.winz.co.nz and gets packet losss the problem is between you > and winz.co.nz > > > Quoting Sahil Gupta - Net4U Limited <sahil(a)sahil.net.nz>: > > > As below with "###" > > > > On Sun, 31 Mar 2002, Malcolm Lockyer wrote: > > > > > > > > Let me just jump in here, since I was on site.. > > > > > > On Sun, 31 Mar 2002, Craig Whitmore wrote: > > > > > > > A few things which may help (not in any order) > > > > > > > > 1) Look at Stats of Frame-Relay Connection (Any Errors??) (Geting Telecom > > to > > > > do BIR TEST) > > > > > > Don't know - forgot the router's ip address, so I can't telnet in and > > > check - sahil will though. (just do a show frame-relay pvc right?) > > > > > > > 2) Are they getting what they are paying for? Are they getting CIR > > before > > > > before any errors occur? Remember the 384K is not promised, only 64K is > > > > promised, any extra bandwidth depends on ALOT of things. > > > > > > Don't know - originally it was being traffic shapped at 384K - which I > > > thought could give the same behavior (ie - the cisco over subscribes the > > > bandwidth). After removing the traffic shaping - the pings were a little > > > lower. > > > > ### I think that the guy needs to up his PVC, I feel he is pushing through > > more than the CIR of the circuit and the circuit seems to be falling close > > to the CIR most of the times. > > > > > > > > > 3) Define "Packet loss"? slow downloads? > > > > > > Well - we've only heard from the asian guy (no offence, but kinda a > > little > > > bad at english) that they get packet losses up to 45%, and when they get > > > packet loss the whole internet is "slow", and people get the "cannot find > > > server errors". > > > > ### He gets packet losses the moment they begin to download, he > > unfortunately pings "www.winz.co.nz" and "www.net4u.co.nz". While he > > pings www.net4u.co.nz he doesn't get any packet loss even while > > downloading, only thing when he jumps out of our network and onto the WWW > > he begins facing packet loss i.e. while pinging www.winz.co.nz > > > > > > > > > 4) Check Settings on Routers on either end (Are both ends different > > hardware > > > > (Any compatibility issues between hardware))? > > > > > > Nope - there is a cisco 2501 and a 2503. > > > > > > > 5) Check Telecom has Circuit defined right.. > > > Dunno - we should ask though. > > > > ###I think Telecom have set it right. Only thing using MRTG I have seen > > them pull upto 440k. Which is why I decided to traffic-shape their link > > as it was affecting other users. > > > > > > > > > 6) Are routers running at high CPU? For example 2500's can't handle > > much > > > > bandwidth thru them without going Kaput and slowing things down > > > > > > Umm.. both the routers were running at about 45ish% cpu usage. However, > > > there was very little ram on the 2503 (4mb) - and it is handling about a > > > meg of shaped traffic now - could that be it? > > > > ###Today, I went and swapped the 2 DRAM Chips around (BTW, Malcolm that > > bent case isn't shutting.. you may need to come around) it seems better, > > but not the BEST. I have also ordered in some 16MB Parity Kingston RAM, > > I'll give that a go. > > > > > > > > > 7) Check External Devices (ethernet convertor on 2500/Serial > > > > Cables/Ehternet) > > > > > > The AUI trancivers seem fine. > > > > > > > 8) On Frame Relay connections, you have not "over subscribed" the Access > > (ie > > > > trying to total of 2M CIR's over a 1M Circuit)? > > > > > > Well - its possible with the traffic shaping rules we were using (ie - > > > shaped to the PIR - when it is running a 25% CIR) > > > > ###Nope, definately NOT. Our end has 3 PVC's off our 1Meg Access and > > they sum up to 1024k > > > > > > > > > 9) MTU set right on both ends? > > > > > > Dunno - Sahil - check > > > > > ### They both say "0 01" > > > > > > Thats just some info about what happenes - any more ideas? > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Craig Whitmore > > > > Orcon Internet > > > > http://www.orcon.net.nz > > > > > > > > > > > --snip-- > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > Malcolm Lockyer > > > > > > -- > > > owner/founder/managing director > > > > > > -= Nuron Net =- > > > You're on the net! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz > > where the body of your message reads: > > unsubscribe nznog > > > > > > - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 1

Re: Frame-Relay Packet Loss
by Sahil Gupta - Net4U Limited 31 Mar '02

31 Mar '02

I think he has a weird feeling that www.winz.co.nz is good old "Work and Income New Zealand" On Sun, 31 Mar 2002, Keith Davidson wrote: > > ### He gets packet losses the moment they begin to download, he > > unfortunately pings "www.winz.co.nz" and "www.net4u.co.nz". While he > > pings www.net4u.co.nz he doesn't get any packet loss even while > > downloading, only thing when he jumps out of our network and onto the WWW > > he begins facing packet loss i.e. while pinging www.winz.co.nz > > Why on earth is he pinging my network? > > Keith Davidson > > > - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

3 4

Frame-Relay Packet Loss
by Sahil Gupta - Net4U Limited 31 Mar '02

31 Mar '02

Hello there, We currently have a Frame-Relay Customer, they seem to be experiencing packet loss (upto 45%) when they begin a download. However it isn't the case on our end. Any pointers? They are running a 64/384k PVC and are an Intenret Cafe. Cheers, Sahil - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

4 4

OT: Old Stuff
by Malcolm Lockyer 29 Mar '02

29 Mar '02

Hello all, Sorry for the off topic post, and comerical nature of this post. But, I'm looking at doing a project about the devaluation of equipment. How routers/switches/hubs etc. etc. which cost $$$'s of dollars, then become almost worthless only a few years latter. So for the project it would be good to have some old gear on hand. So - I was wondering if people had old cisco switches/routers/anything, or any other branded equipment - thats old/broken/not relyable anymore that they wouldn't mind parting with. If you are in the hamilton/Auckland area, I'll come and get gear, or pay for shipping. I'm even happy to give a couple of dollars for stuff that still works okay. Thanks alot! - it'd be very thankful for ANYTHING. (BTW - please message me off list). Best regards, Malcolm Lockyer -- owner/founder/managing director -= Nuron Net =- You're on the net! - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Prefixes, and gonzo...
by James Tyson 29 Mar '02

29 Mar '02

Okay, it's official, I am a gonzo. I admit it freely. This is the classic example of when your brain fried, and working on completely new configs for about 10 routers at once. Anyay, I think all the emails from people saying "Hey, what about...." have finished coming in. Here's the *actual* prefix list for our networks (must rememember the customers edition): ip prefix-list callplus-networks contact noc(a)noc.attica.net.nz ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 202.14.252.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 202.49.62.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 202.49.82.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 202.49.250.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 202.50.60.0/22 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 202.50.170.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 210.55.111.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 210.55.158.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 210.55.254.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 202.180.116.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 202.37.129.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 202.180.64.0/18 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 192.100.53.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 202.27.48.0/21 le 24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 202.27.56.0/22 le 24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 202.36.204.0/23 le 24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 202.49.152.0/21 le 24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 202.154.128.0/19 le 24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 203.96.16.0/20 le 24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks permit 203.96.48.0/20 le 24 Please don't ask me to convert it into JunOS speak, my brain is fried. -- Cheers. --- James Tyson Moebius Systems Ltd http://www.moebius.co.nz/ - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 1

Anti-spammers...
by Terence Giufre-Sweetser 28 Mar '02

28 Mar '02

Anyone interested in formalizing an affiliation with the various anti-spam lobbies around the globe, and set up branch of CAUCE? or CaUBE.au? http://www.caube.org.au/join.htm --- Terence C. Giufre-Sweetser +---------------------------------+--------------------------+ | TereDonn Telecommunications Ltd | Phone +61-[0]7-32369366 | | 1/128 Bowen St, SPRING HILL | FAX +61-[0]7-32369930 | | PO BOX 1054, SPRING HILL 4004 | Mobile +61-[0]414-663053 | | Queensland Australia | http://www.tdce.com.au | +---------------------------------+--------------------------+ - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

New Prefix List
by James Tyson 26 Mar '02

26 Mar '02

Hi Folks. Just letting you all know that we will be doing some major work on the Attica/Callplus network over the easter weekend, and you can all expect to see your APE and WIX peering sessions die at some stage in the early hours of Saturday morning. Also, here is our current prefix-list if your interested: ip prefix-list callplus-networks contact noc(a)noc.attica.net.nz ip prefix-list callplus-networks seq 5 permit 202.14.252.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks seq 10 permit 202.49.62.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks seq 15 permit 202.49.82.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks seq 20 permit 202.49.250.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks seq 25 permit 202.50.60.0/22 ip prefix-list callplus-networks seq 30 permit 202.50.170.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks seq 35 permit 210.55.111.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks seq 40 permit 210.55.158.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks seq 45 permit 210.55.254.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks seq 50 permit 202.180.116.0/24 ip prefix-list callplus-networks seq 55 permit 202.180.64.0/18 Joy! -- Cheers. --- James Tyson Moebius Systems Ltd http://www.moebius.co.nz/ - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 1

NZNOG, UniForum and the Conference
by Donald Neal 25 Mar '02

25 Mar '02

The UniForum NZ board met on Saturday, 16th March, and spent most of its time discussing matters related to the upcoming conference. NZNOG has been proceeding on the basis that it is going to be holding a gathering which is to take the form of a stream at that conference, to be held in Auckland in July. NZNOG seems to me to have a strong programme lined up, and there have been many expressions of interest in attending. But given the fact that we've never done this before, it is hard to be precise about how many people we can expect to turn up. At which point things have the potential to get a bit more complex. Two views were expressed at the meeting of the relationship between UniForum NZ and the conference. The majority view held that UniForum holds the conference in part to attract membership. Also, a surplus made on the operation of a conference for a society's members is not taxed, while a surplus made on a conference attended by non-members has a tax status which is not clear. UniForum NZ has in the past included a year's subscription in the non-member registration rate for its conferences, so that in fact only members attended. The minority view - held by me and by one other board member also from outside Wellington - held that UniForum NZ exists primarily in order to provide the conference. Since NZNOG's involvement contributes substantially to the conference, it is therefore a good thing. Attracting UniForum membership is good, but not the purpose of the conference. The board decided that all attendees at the upcoming conference should be members of UniForum NZ. This has the potential to be a problem, but it is not yet clear to me how large a problem. No final decision has yet been made on registration charges for this year's conference, but a figure for ordinary registrants of around $200 per day including morning and afternoon teas and lunch seems likely. Arrangements regarding dinner are still being considered. An "early bird" registration offer of noticeably less than that is planned. At present, UniForum NZ's annual subscription is $85 including GST. To add this figure to the sort of registration charge previously discussed on this list would make a noticeable difference to the amount people are being asked to pay. Among the issues now being considered by UniForum NZ is what sort of organisation it wants to be. If it decides to take something like the minority view of itself, it has the option of cutting its overheads and reducing its annual subscription to something low enough that bundling it in with a conference registration would not be a problem. This will be considered in the next couple of months, but I cannot predict the outcome of that consideration. This discussion came as something of a surprise to me, but it appears that Linux User Group members with whom this has been discussed do not have a problem with this level of registration charge. The first question then becomes how much money NZNOG people are willing to part with to attend. $200 per day is not bad when compared to commercial training of any kind, but is significantly more than the amounts that have been discussed on this list in the past. A rate well below that is to be available to those who register early. I'd like to hear (to me, not the list please) from anyone who'd plan to attend at a cost of around $200 for two days but have a problem paying more than that, and from anyone who'd attend at a cost of around $300 for two days but have a problem paying more than that. And what happens if I hear from lots of people? I'm not sure. For now I simply intend to see how many people get back to me over the next couple of days. -- Donald Neal Special Operations Network Delivery Telecom New Zealand Ltd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you." ============================================================================== - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 1

Spoofed mail
by Matt Camp 21 Mar '02

21 Mar '02

Is anyone else getting strange spoofed mail from saarinen.org, or mail from there destined to lists with your own address as the spoofed source? Email to Juha isn't getting any sort of response, so I figure he's either been hax0red, or needs a beating with the clue stick. (possibly both?) Either way, Make It Stop. Now. ---------------- Return-Path: <owner-nznet-gargoyle-noise-gargoyle=noise.net.nz(a)noise.net.nz> Delivered-To: gargoyle-noise-gargoyle(a)noise.net.nz Received: (qmail 28603 invoked by uid 30); 20 Mar 2002 22:16:36 -0000 Delivered-To: nznet(a)paradise.gen.nz Date: 20 Mar 2002 22:16:36 -0000 Message-ID: <20020320221636.28602.qmail(a)tombstone.b.org.nz> From: gargoyle(a)tombstone.b.org.nz Cc: recipient list not shown: ; Received: (qmail 28590 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2002 22:16:33 -0000 Received: from saarinen.org (HELO ehlo) (203.79.82.14) by tombstone.paradise.gen.nz with SMTP; 20 Mar 2002 22:16:33 -0000 test Sender: owner-nznet(a)noise.net.nz Precedence: bulk Reply-To: nznet(a)noise.net.nz Return-Path: <testy(a)test.com> Delivered-To: gargoyle-noise-gargoyle(a)noise.net.nz Received: (qmail 11126 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2002 01:50:48 -0000 Received: from saarinen.org (HELO helo) (203.79.82.14) by tombstone.paradise.gen.nz with SMTP; 21 Mar 2002 01:50:48 -0000 test --- Matt Camp - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

3 4

Re: Spoofed mail
by Mark Foster 20 Mar '02

20 Mar '02

Amazing the influence 'script kiddies' have had on the way we diagnose problems, isnt it? :P At 14:40 21/03/02 +1200, Matt Camp wrote: >Ok, problem resolved... no script kiddies in sight, just some mail servers >refusing to do TLS happily, and majordomo adding headers when it should >be. - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Matt, could you please call me?
by Juha Saarinen 20 Mar '02

20 Mar '02

Do a whois on my domain for the number. Can't email you... Sorry for the OT post, but I have no other way of contacting Matt. -- Juha Take off every sig! - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Re: The SRS and Lame Delegations
by Ewen McNeill 18 Mar '02

18 Mar '02

NOTE: I've been trying to avoid being drawn into this discussion, as I'm working with the registry implementation team at present, but I feel I should comment on this. In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203191150120.1813-100000(a)belsay.lionra.net.nz>, Andy Linton writes: >I'd argue that unless the name appears in the DNS it shouldn't appear in >the registry as its appearance of the name in the DNS that gives the >registry any authority it has. I'm generally of this view too. While I'm not totally against "database only" registrations, I tend to prefer that registrars that are "parking" names (for want of a description), do so by putting up DNS entries that point at a "this name is reserved for $foo" type webpage. (This also simplifies the code at the registry.) A lot of people typically check for name availability by looking for NS records, or web pages, or MX records for the zone; and I haven't yet seen a strong reason why this should be defeated. >I'd like to see the registry operate on the principle that the names >registered are listed in both the registry's database and the DNS (plus or >minus the next scheduled update). This implies that the nameservers should >be operational and checked at the time of resistration. However it doesn't imply that it should be the registry that does this checking that the nameservers are operational. The SRS (business framework) relies on the registrars Doing The Right Thing (tm) in various instances, and it seems to me that ensuring the nameservers are working is another thing that the registrars should be doing. Much of the "nameserver isn't ready yet" type concerns could be "solved" by simply requiring registrars to ensure that the nameserver is ready by the next zone build. (Then a registrar that is doing a registration against their own nameservers can simply schedule their nameserver reload to happen shortly before the registry zone build happens. Registrations against external name servers would probably need checking before registration, by the registrar, as they are now.) Some appropriate entity (perhaps the registry, but perhaps more appropriately the DNS manager) should be responsible for "quality checking" delegations, by periodically doing a zone walk and looking for lame delegations. When found the DNS manager could take the issue up with the appropriate registrar (in terms of "being a good registrar"). Registrars may wish to walk their own portion of the delegations periodically as part of being a good registrar/keeping their registrants in line. FWIW, I can't help thinking that this has been discussed a few times before in the past. Ewen - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

3 3

RE: The SRS and Lame Delegations
by Zanetti David 18 Mar '02

18 Mar '02

From: Peter Mott [mailto:peter.mott(a)2day.com] > [1] Registrar should be able to register a name without specifying any name > servers Since Peter has raised this, how does everyone else feel about allowing registars to reserve names on behalf of nameholders in this way. Should the name have no entry in the zone, something explanatory like a TXT record, or should we not allow this at all, and that only fully delegated names be allowed? -- David Zanetti <david.zanetti(a)nzpost.co.nz> Security Engineer, New Zealand Post Desk: +64-4-496-4005 Mobile: +64-25-832-572 "Hope.. is a dangerous thing" This email with any attachments is confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If it is not intended for you please reply immediately, destroy it and do not copy, disclose or use it in any way. - To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

5 5