- NZNOG - lists.nznog.org

RE: NZIX is gone!
by Rob Edkins 06 Aug '01

06 Aug '01

Arron wrote: > Them were the glory days ... New Zealand's routing table in IGRP (no not EIGRP), 24 routers connected via Coax and a 1.5Mbps Frame Relay link to the US.< ...and you tell the kids today that, and they doooooon't believe yer! ;-) Rob __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

NZIX is gone !!!
by Lindsay Druett 05 Aug '01

05 Aug '01

Hi, As of 10:45am this morning the last router (HNCR1) was turned off, and by 11:45am NZIX (as far as University of Waikato is concerned) has been fully dismantled. As most providers most providers have stopped peering with NZIX late last year, I thought it would be worth making note that as of this morning, NZIX is now part of New Zealand internet's history books, and is no longer in existence. Kind Regards, Lindsay. Lindsay Druett, CCNA, CCDA, NZTC (Elect.) Network Engineer, Network and Development, Information and Technology Services, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. lindsayd(a)waikato.ac.nz Phone 64-7-838 4999 Fax 64-7-838 4416 Mobile 025-276 0700 <<Lindsay Druett.vcf>>

3 2

Wellington 2
by Dean Pemberton 05 Aug '01

05 Aug '01

Well wellington wasn't so dead afterall. Turns out that all we needed as a 1.5 metre tall whip antenna bolted to the top of Simon Blakes car. Yes we have photos I'll get them developed when I get back to Oz. Dean --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

9 20

smtp.xtra.co.nz --- sick?
by Chris Wedgwood 05 Aug '01

05 Aug '01

I'm seeing funnies to smtp.xtra.co.nz --- basically some connections when sending email are terribly slow, while others work perfectly well. Does anyone know if this address is a load-balancer or something? If that's the case then it might be a host behind it is a bit sick or something... I'm seeing 10 second delays or more between having received a TCP ACK and getting an SMTP ACK back. The helpdesk didn't seem too interested, I didn't even ask if they wanted to see my packet dumps[1] :) --cw [1] Another outstanding pickup line. --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 1

Code Red V3!?
by Mark Foster 05 Aug '01

05 Aug '01

http://www.idg.net.nz/webhome.nsf/UNID/3B65B7D06B08DB2DCC256AA00001AF76!ope… -.-. --.- Mark Foster - markf(a)intermech.co.nz IT Manager, Intermech Ltd +64-21-499-368 / +64-9-525-2220 http://www.intermech.co.nz --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 1

RE: NZIX is gone !!!
by Lindsay Druett 05 Aug '01

05 Aug '01

John Houlker will be touched... Everybody should turn off all their routers for a minute, as a mark of resepect. --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Different Code Red?
by Juha Saarinen 05 Aug '01

05 Aug '01

I'm getting lots of hits on my home box, unfortunately. 142 since August 1 is the latest count. :-( Noticed that the GET requests look different now: 203.231.234.229 - - [05/Aug/2001:11:46:35 +1200] "GET /default.ida?XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9 090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u9090%u8190%u00c3%u0003%u8b00%u531b%u53ff%u0 078%u0000%u00=a HTTP/1.0" 404 283 "-" "-" Whereas earlier on, they looked like this: 65.192.84.7 - - [05/Aug/2001:06:51:26 +1200] "GET /default.ida?NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN%u9090%u68 58%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u90 90%u8190%u00c3%u0003%u8b00% u531b%u53ff%u0078%u0000%u00=a HTTP/1.0" 400 330 "-" "-" -- Juha Saarinen --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

15 27

idg.net.nz --- IMHO privacy implications of archives are debatable (Paul Brislen)
by Chris Wedgwood 05 Aug '01

05 Aug '01

In light of recent comments WRT a certain IDG article I find: http://www.idg.net.nz/webhome.nsf/UNID/EA33E2992D04A5C0CC256A9E0010FACC!ope… Ah, internet. Bane and boon of my life. What would I do without you, dear old friend? Well, for a start, I wouldn't be following a language tutor's advice quite so often. He told me there are two steps to learning a foreign language. Step one: open mouth. Step two: insert foot. [...] Most entertaining of all, however, is that when I rewrote the story for Computerworld it changed the story as it appears on the web. The old version ("Newsgroups could be breaching privacy act") was effectively replaced with a new one ("Privacy issue over mailing list archives") in a single Orwellian moment. Ironic, really, when you consider the story in the first place was triggered by a question about whether an archive could or should be changed to remove old postings. Pretty reasonable comments this time, certainly worth reading. --cw --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Globe.NET (www.globe.net.nz) Mail Server full
by Craig Whitmore 04 Aug '01

04 Aug '01

If anyone has any contacts for Globe.NET (www.globe.net.nz) (I've tried their 0508 number and no answer) can you please contact them and tell them that their mail server has no space left on its Disk. Thanks Craig Whitmore Orcon Internet http://www.orcon.net.nz

1 0

CodeRed Worm Stats
by Brian Gibbons 04 Aug '01

04 Aug '01

>From: Craig Whitmore >I just did some graphs of the codered worms attacking over today.. and have a look at >http://www.nzdsl.co.nz/codered >Anyone got any similar stats?? Similar stats from one of our boxes that does nothing all day except ignore ARP broadcasts on it's LAN segment. http://www.outersite.co.nz/codered.html This is probably ho hum for many, however I pity those that pay per MB. At NZ retail rates a box infected with CodeRed could easily burn bandwidth at $300 per hour, fairly scary to come back Monday to find your box has burnt $15,000 over the weekend. BG --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Increase in Code Red activity?
by Brian Gibbons 04 Aug '01

04 Aug '01

We have noticed a large increase (10 fold) in CodeRed activity since bang on midnight last night. The probe rate seems to have now leveled off at one probe per IP address every three minutes. This activity was actually noticed from monitoring of broadcast traffic on an ethernet LAN (TCP SYN to Black hole LAN IP address). If WorldNet are listening, these two systems are hitting us regularly 210.55.74.165 210.55.76.51 Cheers BG. --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

4 3

CodeRed Worm Stats
by Craig Whitmore 04 Aug '01

04 Aug '01

I just did some graphs of the codered worms attacking over today.. and have a look at http://www.nzdsl.co.nz/codered The last batch of attacks started about 11pm last night.. This is from 2 completely different networks in NZ and the results where about the Same The 1st graph is 1 Machine only and the 2nd Graph is a C Class. Pretty Scary.. Anyone got any similar stats?? The worse offenders are a couple of machines @ worldnet so far. Thanks Craig Whitmore Orcon Internet http://www.nzdsl.co.nz

1 0

FW: Alert: New version of Code Red, XXXX
by Chris Woodrow 04 Aug '01

04 Aug '01

Cross posted from the NTBugtraq list -----Original Message----- From: Russ [mailto:Russ.Cooper(a)RC.ON.CA] Sent: Sunday, 5 August 2001 3:48 p.m. To: NTBUGTRAQ(a)LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM Subject: Alert: New version of Code Red, XXXX -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Just a quick FYI, there is a new version of Code Red which appears to be spreading rather rapidly. - - Appears to be a new re-write. - - Drops some sort of remote access trojan. - - Turns off System File Checker (Windows File Protection.) - - Moves CMD.EXE to the scripts directory in IIS - - Looks like the way they make the entry into code very differently than before. - - If your IDS is looking for "NNNN", forget it (but then you should have been shot if you used this string anyway) Cheers, Russ - Surgeon General of TruSecure Corporation/NTBugtraq Editor p.s. if we don't respond right away its because we're now going to go and light the fireworks here at my retreat. Might as well have lots of fireworks tonight! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.2 iQCVAwUBO2zCARBh2Kw/l7p5AQH95wQAqjGp7vRYK8SYky/ydyU1wxBmCe2c8Mpd DBdxrv+TY9112ZuH663ZspUOXThS9oeEyT4sdbVYNv8Z28nMipbioyTXYa5dw8po 21tkilo6ZoGX+AmKJ6Kz7WDvMpHpEfzDr3JHGtxuev0/rclXeRSN4urypMR3YnRz uw5ZW/F3U/I= =OhCV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Delivery co-sponsored by Trend Micro ============================================================================ TREND MICRO REAL-TIME VIRUS ALERTS If you would like to know about a virus outbreak before CNN and ZDNet get Trend Micro Virus Info Feed FREE. Simply copy and paste a small piece of code to give your visitors a real-time top 10 list and the latest virus advisories. Setup takes just 10 minutes and requires no server-side code on your Web site. All content is updated automatically from Trend Micro's Web site. http://www.antivirus.com/banners/tracking.asp?si=8&bi=237&ul=/syndication/ vinfo/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

RE: Different Code Red?
by Thomas Salmen 04 Aug '01

04 Aug '01

For those who havn't seen yet - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Just a quick FYI, there is a new version of Code Red which appears to be spreading rather rapidly. - - Appears to be a new re-write. - - Drops some sort of remote access trojan. - - Turns off System File Checker (Windows File Protection.) - - Moves CMD.EXE to the scripts directory in IIS - - Looks like the way they make the entry into code very differently than before. - - If your IDS is looking for "NNNN", forget it (but then you should have been shot if you used this string anyway) Cheers, Russ - Surgeon General of TruSecure Corporation/NTBugtraq Editor p.s. if we don't respond right away its because we're now going to go and light the fireworks here at my retreat. Might as well have lots of fireworks tonight! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.2 iQCVAwUBO2zCARBh2Kw/l7p5AQH95wQAqjGp7vRYK8SYky/ydyU1wxBmCe2c8Mpd DBdxrv+TY9112ZuH663ZspUOXThS9oeEyT4sdbVYNv8Z28nMipbioyTXYa5dw8po 21tkilo6ZoGX+AmKJ6Kz7WDvMpHpEfzDr3JHGtxuev0/rclXeRSN4urypMR3YnRz uw5ZW/F3U/I= =OhCV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Quite exciting really, isn't it? Regards, Thomas Salmen System Administrator Radionet Ltd. 1/72 Paul Matthews Road Albany, Auckland, New Zealand Ph: +64 9 414 0300 ext 718 -----Original Message----- From: Dan Langille [mailto:dan(a)langille.org] Sent: Sunday, 5 August 2001 4:00 p.m. To: Juha Saarinen Cc: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: Re: Different Code Red? On 5 Aug 2001, at 11:53, Juha Saarinen wrote: > I'm getting lots of hits on my home box, unfortunately. 142 since August > 1 is the latest count. :-( > > Noticed that the GET requests look different now: [snip] Some look different: [dan(a)dev:/var/log] $ grep -c "default.ida?X" /var/log/httpd-access.log 12 [dan(a)dev:/var/log] $ grep -c "default.ida?N" /var/log/httpd-access.log 116 [dan(a)dev:/var/log] $ grep -c "default.ida" /var/log/httpd-access.log 128 The above represents the last 24 hours EST. All hits were against the IP address, not against any known domain (i.e. the HTTP headers did not include a domain name). -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger dan(a)unixathome.org | http://unixathome.org/finger.php --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Code Red v. II
by Juha Saarinen 03 Aug '01

03 Aug '01

Arrghhh... three times as many hits: pts/0 juha(a)vimfuego:/mnt/hdb6/home/juha$ grep -c default.ida /var/log/httpd/access_log 54 -- Juha Saarinen --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 1

The Wellington Wander
by Dean Pemberton 02 Aug '01

02 Aug '01

Ok the numbers are in. Wellington scored much less usage on the wireless front Well less on the 'being able to pick up with a dinky antenna on the sidewalk' front I happen to know for certain that there are wireless stations out there that I missed Wellington seems to have a few hot spots rather than a general level of wireless. It does score higher on the security side though. Of the 17 networks that I saw, 9 were using WEP The ones that weren't however did try valiantly to give me IP addresses and invite me onto their networks. This kinda freaked me out (this is not an intrusion attempt remember) so I ended up disabling all protocols on that interface In the spirit of Tim Allen I think I need more power. So I'm on the lookout for a larger antenna, and I think I know just the place to get one on loan =) Later Dean --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

7 8

Re: Dean's Wireless Walkabout
by Dean Pemberton 02 Aug '01

02 Aug '01

HAHAHAHA ROFLMAO Choccie Fish for Joe here. Yes of course I mean 802.11 hahaha - I'm still laughing at that cock up. So how many people were worried that I could see their Vlans from the street? Dean On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 10:48:38PM +1200, Joe Lewis wrote: > > Hi, umm feel free to shoot me down but don't you mean 802.11(b)? > > --- > Joe Lewis > > On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Dean Pemberton wrote: > > > > > Hi all; > > > > Yes this might be a first, I'm going to drag the topic BACK to something network related. > > > > I happen to be in Auckland today. Flew in for customer chit chat which will happen tommorow. > > Had a spare afternoon and no one to see so I thought I might do the geek thing and see how little old Auckland was getting along with it's wireless networking. > > > > SO, I slapped the 802.1Q card into the laptop and strapped the GPS onto the outside of my backpack and went for a walk. > > > > I walked down Queen Street from the top to the water, and then back up to Albert St to Wellesley then back up Symonds to my hotel. > > > > Well. Auckland sure is brimming with wireless. But the concern (and I spose the reason that I posted this at all) was that most of it is insecure. > > > > Now I'm a good guy. I don't want to get access to anything, god knows I see enough internet as it is. I just wanted to see how many places had embraced the 802.1Q fad. > > > > So all in all 29 networks jumped out and grabbed me as I was walking past. only 4 of them were using WEP. > > Now because I didn't actually try to gain access to any of them, I have no idea what the internal security of them is like. But I'm not expecting much. > > > > I don't think I sniffed anything off the sky tower, I was only using the small antenna on the card. > > > > So if you run a wireless network in the center of Auckland and you were using the strategy of "Oh it will never make it down to the street" Then you are wrong and you might like to put some more security on. > > > > I thought about mailing my networklist out as well. But I decided against it. Mainly because it has exact GPS locations and network names. It would make easy pickings for anyone who wanted to gain access. > > If you want to mail me privatly with your network name and/or card MAC address then I will give you a yes or no answer. > > > > Dont feel alone though. I've done the same in North Sydney and come up with similar numbers. > > > > Next week wellington. > > > > Have fun > > > > Dean > > --------- > > To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz > > where the body of your message reads: > > unsubscribe nznog > > > --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

6 10

Proposed Change to Acceptable Use Policy
by Donald Neal 02 Aug '01

02 Aug '01

NZNOG People, It is not always obvious, but this list does have an acceptable use policy. Here it is: ---------- NZNOG Mailing List Acceptable Use Policy The NZNOG mailing list exists to provide a forum for the exchange of technical information and the discussion of implementation issues that require cooperation among New Zealand network service providers. In order to continue to provide a useful forum for discussion of relevant technical issues, users of the list are asked to respect the following guidelines. 1. Discussion will focus on Internet operational and technical issues. 2. Discussion related to meetings of network service providers is appropriate. 3. Discussion unrelated to these topics is not appropriate. 4. Postings to multiple mailing lists are discouraged. 5. Postings that include foul language, character assassination, and lack of respect for other participants are unacceptable. 6. Blatant product or service marketing is unacceptable. 7. Postings of a political, philosophical or legal nature are discouraged. 8. Postings to the list should be in ASCII or MIME encoded as text/plain. Attachments should not be sent to the list. To present a document, a suitable URL may be referred to. For documents of general interest, the use of proprietary file formats is discouraged. 9. Breaches of list etiquette should be dealt with privately with the offending list user, and should not result in complaints being sent to the list. ---------- This has served us well enough for a number of years. I now propose the following addition: 10. A person repeatedly breaching list etiquette shall receive warnings from the list administrator. A further breach after the second such warning within thirty days shall result in the offender being unsubscribed from the list. Other action may also be taken to block postings to the list by the offender. Any such unsubscription is to be immediately announced to the list. Votes on this change to me (not the list!) by midday, Friday 10 August, please. In the interim, I intend to proceed as I outlined previously. I shall issue formal warnings for irrelevant or abusive postings, and shall act to block postings as soon as a third warning within thirty days is issued to any individual. To avoid any appearance of retrospective action, I shall start counting warnings only from the appearance of this posting to the list. NB: This wiping of the slate excludes persons who have during the last week threatened me with legal action or have threatened to approach my employers to get them to influence my issuing of warnings for inappropriate posting. I consider that those involved have received far more warning than most people already. If a majority of votes cast support the change, this will become permanent practice, and the list will switch in the near future to accepting postings only from addresses supplied in advance. If the majority oppose it, we shall return to relying on people's goodwill. Unless someone else has a better idea? Donald --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

RE: IP Address Management software.
by Steve Lang 02 Aug '01

02 Aug '01

Hiya. > Solarwinds (solarwinds.net) have a pretty cool suite of tools > that include > among others, IP management tools. They cost, but if you have > real buisiness > needs they are more cost effective than other commercial > solutions (Ci$co > included), and will quickly justify the cost. I had found them as well. Useful, and not that expensive when compared with others. > Network Address Recovery (This pings all IP address ranges > that you tell it > on a predetermined regular period (default 4 Hours), and > reports on the last > time an IP address was seen on the network) > There is a sample screen shot @ > http://solarwinds.net/Tools/Network_Discovery/Network_Address_ > Recovery/NetAd > Rec-1.gif I tested this, it looked quite good, but it's insistence at pinging things was annoying. > DHCP Scope Monitor (Requires Micro$soft DHCP and SNMP with > obviously NOT > public as the community string) Eeek. That would be interesting. Cheers and thanx. --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

IP Address Management software.
by Steve Lang 02 Aug '01

02 Aug '01

Hiya all. 'Been lurking here for a while now, and actually have something worth saying now! I'm looking into IP Address Management packages. I've grazed through google, and a few others, and found pointers to many. It seems that there are a few packages that purport to allow people to manage IP Address space, but many of them focus on the integration of DHCP/DNS. Now, for what I'm after at the moment, this isn't an issue, and all I really want is something that can document allocations and what they're used for. There are some packages that don't exist now, and a couple that have changed hands within the last few years. An understanding of VLSM/CIDR etc. is required, although maybe not an understanding, but an allowance to docuement super/subnets. What do you, the contributors to this list use? And yes, I've done the spreadsheet thing to death... Cheers - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Lang Telephone: +64-9-309-7918 Consultant DDI: +64-9-307-5584 Optimation New Zealand Limited. Mobile: +64-25-864-653 P.O.Box 106104 Fax: +64-9-309-7919 Auckland E-mail: steve.lang(a)optimation.co.nz New Zealand Web: www.optimation.co.nz --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

4 4

M1122 --- spontaneously corrupting flash
by Chris Wedgwood 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

Anyone out there inflicted with an M1122? I am, and for the second time to me, and third time in total (once at my old work) have had these modem die completely... Investigation (via console) has shown, in every single case, the flash has gotten corrupted or something, as image.exe (the firmware that is booted from ROM) is either corrupt or deleted. The worst thing is, the console refused to respond, which really sucks, as it means I can't revert to the previous image or put a new one on it. To make life even more interesting, the phone lines here are pretty spectacular, modems barely work and when they do, they drop about every 10 minutes or so even when you lock the modulation to v34 in an attempt to make things more reliable. --cw --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Re: Crap
by Donald Neal 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

>>> "Matt Camp" <gargoyle(a)noise.net.nz> 08/01/01 08:55 >>> >I'd like to ask that this list is immediatly changed to drop non-member >submissions, and that Joe and Jeff are removed. >There is off topic conversation, and then there is pointless, induced, >drivel. NZNOG People, I'm not willing to get involved in a process of deciding for myself that one poster's five postings are cause for blocking, and someone else's are not. And the balance of the (admittedly small) number of emails I got on the subject last month was against restricting postings. On the other hand, I'm not at all happy with this list's s/n ratio. I have this morning sent to a number of posters requests not to send further inappropriate postings to this list. If these result in much improved behaviour, well and good. If not, I plan to move to a practice familiar to followers of cricket. Friendly warnings for misbehaviour may be given. Formal warnings follow. Too many formal warnings and you are asked to retire from the match. And yes, that would mean a move to restricting postings to addresses previously supplied, if not necessarily subscribed. Comments on that plan to the list, please. If it seems to me necessary to implement it I plan to put it to a vote as a set of additions to the AUP. When that might happen depends on postings. - Donald Neal List Administrator -- Donald Neal Mobility & Calling Platforms Network Delivery Telecom New Zealand Ltd --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

10 13

Code Red Early warning for SANS
by Jeff Williams 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

All, For your interest on Code Red Worm... See: http://www.digitalisland.net/codered/ for hour to hour reports... I also have an Eradicator if anyone is interested... Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!) CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208 --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Dean's Wireless Walkabout
by Dean Pemberton 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

Hi all; Yes this might be a first, I'm going to drag the topic BACK to something network related. I happen to be in Auckland today. Flew in for customer chit chat which will happen tommorow. Had a spare afternoon and no one to see so I thought I might do the geek thing and see how little old Auckland was getting along with it's wireless networking. SO, I slapped the 802.1Q card into the laptop and strapped the GPS onto the outside of my backpack and went for a walk. I walked down Queen Street from the top to the water, and then back up to Albert St to Wellesley then back up Symonds to my hotel. Well. Auckland sure is brimming with wireless. But the concern (and I spose the reason that I posted this at all) was that most of it is insecure. Now I'm a good guy. I don't want to get access to anything, god knows I see enough internet as it is. I just wanted to see how many places had embraced the 802.1Q fad. So all in all 29 networks jumped out and grabbed me as I was walking past. only 4 of them were using WEP. Now because I didn't actually try to gain access to any of them, I have no idea what the internal security of them is like. But I'm not expecting much. I don't think I sniffed anything off the sky tower, I was only using the small antenna on the card. So if you run a wireless network in the center of Auckland and you were using the strategy of "Oh it will never make it down to the street" Then you are wrong and you might like to put some more security on. I thought about mailing my networklist out as well. But I decided against it. Mainly because it has exact GPS locations and network names. It would make easy pickings for anyone who wanted to gain access. If you want to mail me privatly with your network name and/or card MAC address then I will give you a yes or no answer. Dont feel alone though. I've done the same in North Sydney and come up with similar numbers. Next week wellington. Have fun Dean --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

4 4

RE: Code Red (Take Two)
by Thomas Salmen 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

A little less of an impact this time then, huh? We've had two customers infected, both installs of which were less than a few days old. Seems that most admins (in NZ at least) have been rather better prepared this time round. Don't know if I can say the same for our friends overseas - many of the IPs that I have logged originate in Asia. Some in the States and Europe, but not as many. A few illegal, unpatched IIS installs, maybe... Must say, though, it was rather funny reading about the 'Code Red no-show' in the news this morning... Regards, Thomas Salmen System Administrator Radionet Ltd. 1/72 Paul Matthews Road Albany, Auckland, New Zealand Ph: +64 9 414 0300 ext 718 -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Salmen [mailto:thomas(a)radionet.co.nz] Sent: Thursday, 2 August 2001 2:12 p.m. To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: Code Red (Take Two) Just curious... have many people been affected by the second round of Code Red infections? We have seen plenty of inbound traffic here (well, the odd bit, anyway) but very few of our customers web servers have been hit - not like last time... Regards, Thomas Salmen System Administrator Radionet Ltd. 1/72 Paul Matthews Road Albany, Auckland, New Zealand Ph: +64 9 414 0300 ext 718 --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

3 2