- NZNOG - lists.nznog.org

Code Red (Take Two)
by Thomas Salmen 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

Just curious... have many people been affected by the second round of Code Red infections? We have seen plenty of inbound traffic here (well, the odd bit, anyway) but very few of our customers web servers have been hit - not like last time... Regards, Thomas Salmen System Administrator Radionet Ltd. 1/72 Paul Matthews Road Albany, Auckland, New Zealand Ph: +64 9 414 0300 ext 718 --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

9 9

Hmm.
by David Robb 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

Is this true? http://www.bogusjourney.com/08018.html David Robb --- Senior Network Engineer DDI +64-9-359-2710 ihug (AS7657) NOC +64-9-359-2708 "The Earth is a single point of failure" --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

13 25

(off topic) Stop with all the garbage please.
by stephen sheehan 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

Jeff, Dr Joe and all, I see myself as being fortunate to be a member of this mailing list, to here the wisdom of the local net Gods. It appears some of you do not share this view. I see this list as a valuable resource for the local net industry, and of late it seems to have deteriated into basicly a type of email chatroom for all sorts of off-topic bitching. So I am asking that you please have some respect for the intended purpose of this list and other list members. If you want to bitch to each other or discuss stuff that is not relavent, please do so by private email, as I am sure most of you have better things to do than sort through all the shit that has been posted to the list lately. Sorry for posting this off topic e-mail and sounding like a hypocrite and also adding to the large amount of crap alread on this list. Your sincerely Stephen Sheehan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Alternative List
by Matt Camp 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

A while back an alternative list was proposed... most people seemed quite receptive to the idea... so it now exists. To subscribe, send a mail to majordomo(a)noise.net.nz with 'subscribe nznet' in the body. The alternative list is more informal, and more generally aimed at the NZ Networking industry. It may contain things such as details of used equipment for sale, and discussions which would be regarded as off topic here. Hopefully this will give us a place to discuss such things, and will keep the noise level down here somewhat. --- Matt Camp --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

RE: Crap
by Michael Bordignon 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

maybe uh, ending discussion of this completely off-topic discussion and refraining from replying to any further attempts to revive it may be productive? (including replying to this rhetorical post) Michael > i know this well and so does jeff. example - you filter me > out - or jeff > - or whomever it may be you choose to filter - then some third party > begins the drivel about jeff williams. well - you end up on > the receiving > end of the drivil from the third parties. in most cases > filtering ends up > causing confusion. you would essentially have to filter out > everyone who > is speaking about jeff williams - and that in my opinion is counter > productive. --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 1

Validation of INEGROUP.GOD Domain
by The dot.GOD Registry, Limited 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

Hello: This email will confirm that we have processed your domain registration request for: INEGROUP.GOD. Someone, hopefully you, has registered this domain with us. If not please let us know. You must now visit our web site to validate your domain and enter your validation ticket number. TICKET: 52396544d99665168490 Please click on the following URL to activate your new domain name now. https://secure.dot-god.com/god.nic/validate.cgi?inegroup=52396544d996651684… Or if the above URL does not work (some email systems may crop the URL) then please visit: https://secure.dot-god.com/cgi-bin/validate.cgi and enter the following information manually at the prompt: DOMAIN: inegroup TICKET: 52396544d99665168490 Regards hostmaster(a)dot-god.com http://www.dot-god.com/ The dot.GOD Registry, Limited Executive Plaza, Suite 908 150 West 51st Sreet New York, New York, 10019 US --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

5 5

RED WORM Virus
by Mike Conner 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

Has any one seen the worm yet? Mike Conner. --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

3 3

Code Red growth stats (fwd)
by !Dr. Joe Baptista 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

my contribution to keeping this conference topical today. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 09:44:05 -0700 From: k claffy <kc(a)ipn.caida.org> To: nanog(a)nanog.org Subject: Code Red growth stats (david moore with help from a bunch of elves) http://www.caida.org/analysis/security/code-red/aug1-live-hosts.gif was exponential till about an hour ago, we're not sure if leveling off is due to our monitor load or an actual peak in the data. log-scale version http://www.caida.org/analysis/security/code-red/aug1-live-hosts-log.gif will put on main caida home page later today and update every minute (you'll have to hit reload, and you won't actually notice changes at a minute granularity so please no per-minute cron jobs to reload :) ) note the corresponding graph for 19-20 july: http://www.caida.org/analysis/security/code-red/gifs/cumulative-ts.log.gif no per AS stats for this outbreak yet, also under construction. --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Preemptive strike.
by Andrew Garrett 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

Yes, the name Andrew Garrett has been in the news lately. No, I'm not that Andrew Garrett. Yes, my employer is aware of the name similarity, and has investigated the difference between the two individuals, and is satisfied that we are different people. No, the New Zealand Stock Exchange has not hired a "known hacker". Yes, it is rather amusing. No, not very amusing when you're involved. Regards Andrew "sigh, no, not that one" Garrett --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

6 6

Re: nznog subscriber test (jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com)]
by Jeff Williams 31 Jul '01

31 Jul '01

Olderon and all, All I did was be sure to send my response along with my question to the list. I also send Andrew's response as well to the list as I am this one. It seems that perhaps that Andrew is not in agreement with your assessment. As such, it seems that the test was in and of itself a failure or misleading... ????? Olderon wrote: > Jeff. > That was an Intelligence test. you failed. > > "The easiest was for me to do this is to send each subscriber this > brief email and then examine any bounces and errors." > > See the word each? > > That email was sent to everyone on the list. If any of the email addresses > got bounced back or got errors then they would be deemed inactive and > removed from the list. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com> > To: <nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz> > Cc: "Chris Wedgwood" <cw(a)f00f.org> > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 3:06 PM > Subject: [Fwd: nznog subscriber test (jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com) > > > Chris, > > > > What is this all about? Why is My E-mail being singled out? > > > > -- > > Jeffrey A. Williams > > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!) > > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. > > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. > > E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com > > Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827 > > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208 > > > > Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!) CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208 --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Re: [Fwd: nznog subscriber test (jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com)]
by Jeff Williams 31 Jul '01

31 Jul '01

Sheath and all, Thank you for this clarification. However it does not explain Andrew's response.... ????? sheath(a)paradise.net.nz wrote: > everyone got one with the email addy in the subject line to help with > recording the bounces. > > So each person got a test msg with their own email addy in it. > > SPH > > > Chris, > > > > What is this all about? Why is My E-mail being singled out? > > > > -- > > Jeffrey A. Williams > > Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!) > > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. > > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. > > E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com > > Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827 > > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208 > > > > Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!) CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208 --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Re: [Fwd: nznog subscriber test (jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com)]
by Donald Neal 31 Jul '01

31 Jul '01

>>> "Mark Foster" <blakjak(a)blakjak.net> 08/01/01 01:21 >>> >The list administrator sent every individual on the list an email in order >to analyse the bounces (if any). > >So therefore noone is 'singled out'. [...] No, I didn't. I'm advised of bounces automatically when they occur. The email in question appears to have originated from Chris Wedgwood. He will presumably now tell us why he sent it. - Donald Neal -- Donald Neal Mobility & Calling Platforms Network Delivery Telecom New Zealand Ltd --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Re: [Fwd: nznog subscriber test (jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com)]
by Jeff Williams 31 Jul '01

31 Jul '01

Andrew and all, I always read all my E-mail closely. What Bullshit? Andrew Garrett wrote: > 1. read the e-mail > 2. learn to not clog lists will bullshit. > > At 08:06 PM 7/31/01 -0700, you wrote: > >Chris, > > > > What is this all about? Why is My E-mail being singled out? > > > >-- > >Jeffrey A. Williams > >Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!) > >CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. > >Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. > >E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com > >Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827 > >Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208 > > > >Return-Path: <cw+nznog-test-bounce-jwkckid1=ix.netcom.com(a)f00f.org> > >Received: from weta.f00f.org ([203.167.249.89]) > > by elektra (Earthlink/Netcom Mail Service) with ESMTP id > > tmejqq.lmr.37tiu4v > > for <jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 17:37:46 -0700 (PDT) > >Received: by weta.f00f.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) > > id 18BED159B7; Wed, 1 Aug 2001 12:38:14 +1200 (NZST) > >From: Chris Wedgwood <cw(a)f00f.org> > >To: jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com > >Subject: nznog subscriber test (jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com) > >X-NZNOG-USER: jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com > >Reply-To: cw+nznog-test-dont-reply(a)f00f.org > >Message-Id: <20010801003814.18BED159B7(a)weta.f00f.org> > >Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 12:38:14 +1200 (NZST) > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > > > >Firstly, my apologies for this brief intrusion. I'm currently testing > >which subscribers of nznog are invalid. > > > >The easiest was for me to do this is to send each subscriber this > >brief email and then examine any bounces and errors. > > > >If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me (create a > >new email, don't reply to this or use the subject above, as it may > >interfere with my primitive automagic filtering technique). > > > >I will post a summary of these results to nznog early next week if > >not sooner. > > > > > > > >Thanks, and once again my apologies for this interruption. > > > > --cw -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!) CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208 --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 1

[Fwd: nznog subscriber test (jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com)]
by Jeff Williams 31 Jul '01

31 Jul '01

Chris, What is this all about? Why is My E-mail being singled out? -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!) CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208

2 1

Broadband in Greenhithe?
by Juha Saarinen 31 Jul '01

31 Jul '01

Possible? A person there needs something quicker than dial-up for remote access etc. but was told that Jet{start|stream} isn't available in Greenhithe. The area is Black's Road, top of the ridge. Any advice would be appreciated... :-) -- Juha --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 2

New Zealand Network Operators' Group
by Donald Neal 31 Jul '01

31 Jul '01

The New Zealand Network Operators' Group The New Zealand Network Operators' Group (NZNOG) has no king, president or formal membership. At present it consists of the subscribers to this mailing list, which anyone is free to join. This list has around 260 subscribers, growing by a handful each month. The NZNOG mailing list is provided through a server at The University of Waikato, and is administered by an employee of Telecom NZ Ltd. Neither of these organisations (nor the administrator) is responsible for its content. NZNOG Mailing List Acceptable Use Policy The NZNOG mailing list exists to provide a forum for the exchange of technical information and the discussion of implementation issues that require cooperation among New Zealand network service providers. In order to continue to provide a useful forum for discussion of relevant technical issues, users of the list are asked to respect the following guidelines. 1. Discussion will focus on Internet operational and technical issues. 2. Discussion related to meetings of network service providers is appropriate. 3. Discussion unrelated to these topics is not appropriate. 4. Postings to multiple mailing lists are discouraged. 5. Postings that include foul language, character assassination, and lack of respect for other participants are unacceptable. 6. Blatant product or service marketing is unacceptable. 7. Postings of a political, philosophical or legal nature are discouraged. 8. Postings to the list should be in ASCII or MIME encoded as text/plain. Attachments should not be sent to the list. To present a document, a suitable URL may be referred to. For documents of general interest, the use of proprietary file formats is discouraged. 9. Breaches of list etiquette should be dealt with privately with the offending list user, and should not result in complaints being sent to the list. Mailing List Archives A full archive is available at http://list.waikato.ac.nz/archives/nznog/ Any message sent to the list will be archived and made available on the web automatically. Subscribing to the List To subscribe to the NZNOG list, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz, where the body of the message reads subscribe nznog There are at present no restrictions on who may subscribe to the list, or even on who may post to the list. A recent suggestion that posting be restructed to subscribers received little support. Digest Mailing List If you don't wish to receive postings as they are sent, you can instead subscribe to the nznog-digest mailiing list, on which all postings are sent out in a single "digest" every couple of days. Other Activities NZNOG does not at present have other regular activities than this mailing list. Donald Neal NZNOG Mailing List Owner/Administrator/Muggins --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

IDGNet News: The fixed version
by IDGNetAdministrator＠idg.co.nz 26 Jul '01

26 Jul '01

This message has been sent to you by a user of IDGNet, New Zealand's leading I.T. information Website. Version as of 2:50 26/7/01 Privacy issue over mailing list archives Mailing lists that make archives of their postings publicly accessible on the internet could be in breach of the Privacy Act, according to an Auckland lawyer. http://www.idg.net.nz/webhome.nsf/UNID/29322B8165E1E256CC256A94001886CB?ope… For the latest in I.T. News, Reviews, Opinion and more visit http://idg.net.nz If you wish to block your email address from receiving further emails of this type please email nzwebmaster(a)idg.co.nz. --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

5 4

FW: Help! Cistron major failure in production! (fwd)
by Matt Camp 26 Jul '01

26 Jul '01

Anyone had any experience with cistron radius? I'm suffering some sort of major magic weridy problem, if anyone has any ideas. --- Matt Camp ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 17:24:51 +1200 (NZST) From: Matt Camp <gargoyle(a)noise.net.nz> To: cistron-radius(a)lists.cistron.nl Subject: Help! Cistron major failure in production! I run a network of 4 cistron 1.6.3 servers on FreeBSD machines. This afternoon, all 4 of them stopped responding. Its as like the radiusd process isn't running. Neither our lucent NAS gear, radtest, or the various people who have proxys pointed at our servers get any response at all. The server logs, and console when running in -xxx mode show that the server starts, and then is just waiting for connections. Every 5 minutes, i propagate a new raddb/users file out from a central host. This system has worked fine for around 18 months now. On _ONE_ of the servers, if i restart it (totally. Kill and restart radiusd), the log shows "Wed Jul 25 17:21:38 2001: Info: Starting - reading configuration files ...", then there is nothing for approximately 4 minutes, after which it appears to process all the requests that have been sent to it during that time. (of course, most of them actually fail in reality since the NAS has long since dropped the call). Then it will run fine, up until it detects a new users file, and reloads the config files, at which point its back into total non-responsiveness until i manually restart it. This only works on one server. The other 3 don't come back at all, even after a restart. ANd they're all on the same config. (Which i rsync to them after making a change) radtest tests from localhost which normally work fine just act exactly as if the radiusd process isn't even running. I've tried everything i can think of, including the microsoft approach of power-cycling all machines involved. Load averages are normal, disk space is fine. Heaps of memory available. File descriptor loads seem ok, in that there are only around 100 or so connections to each box in total. (for the other services they run) Any ideas? This is urgent... I've got thousands customers who can't log in right now. --- Matt Camp --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

7 8

xtra rejecting mail from mailing lists?
by Simon Blake 25 Jul '01

25 Jul '01

Hi folks I've got a mailing list on one of my servers that appears to have a bunch of xtra subscribers on it. Postings to the list get sent to about the first 10 xtra users, and then I start getting: Jul 25 21:49:03 wilbur qmail: 996054543.173139 delivery 2330: deferral: Connected_to_203.96.92.131_but_greeting_failed./Remote_host_said: _421_mta4-rme.xtra.co.nz_connection_refused_from_[203.97.152.50]/ It's a fairly unhelpful message from xtra, I assume it's some kind of antispam rate limiting thing - anybody know what they're up to? These things appear to get delivered later, since I've not had any grizzles about non delivery of mail (and there's nothing in the qmail queue). Cheers Si --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

9 13

RE: IDG article.
by David Buckingham 25 Jul '01

25 Jul '01

Privacy Act 1993 028 Commenced: 1 Jul 1993 VI: Codes of Practice and Exemptions from Information Privacy Principles Specific Exemptions 55 Certain personal information excluded 55. Certain personal information excluded---Nothing in principle 6 or principle 7 applies in respect of--- (a) Personal information in the course of transmission by post, telegram, cable, telex, facsimile transmission, electronic mail, or other similar means of communication; or (b) Evidence given or submissions made to--- (i) A Royal Commission; or (ii) A commission of inquiry appointed by an Order in Council made under the Commissions of Inquiry Act 1908,--- at any time before the report of the Royal Commission or commission of inquiry has been published or, in the case of evidence or submissions given or made in the course of a sitting open to the public, at any time before the Royal Commission or commission of inquiry has reported to the Governor-General; or (c) Evidence given or submissions made to a commission of inquiry or board of inquiry or court of inquiry or committee of inquiry appointed, pursuant to, and not by, any provision of an Act, to inquire into a specified matter; or (d) Information contained in any correspondence or communication that has taken place between the office of the Ombudsmen and any agency and that relates to any investigation conducted by an Ombudsman under the Ombudsmen Act 1975 or the Official Information Act 1982 or the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, other than information that came into existence before the commencement of that investigation; or (e) Information contained in any correspondence or communication that has taken place between the office of the Commissioner and any agency and that relates to any investigation conducted by the Commissioner under this Act, other than information that came into existence before the commencement of that investigation. PRINCIPLE 6 Access to personal information (1) Where an agency holds personal information in such a way that it can readily be retrieved, the individual concerned shall be entitled--- (a) To obtain from the agency confirmation of whether or not the agency holds such personal information; and (b) To have access to that information. (2) Where, in accordance with subclause (1) (b) of this principle, an individual is given access to personal information, the individual shall be advised that, under principle 7, the individual may request the correction of that information. (3) The application of this principle is subject to the provisions of Parts IV and V of this Act. (This part is from section 6 of the act)... PRINCIPLE 7 Correction of personal information (1) Where an agency holds personal information, the individual concerned shall be entitled--- (a) To request correction of the information; and (b) To request that there be attached to the information a statement of the correction sought but not made. (2) An agency that holds personal information shall, if so requested by the individual concerned or on its own initiative, take such steps (if any) to correct that information as are, in the circumstances, reasonable to ensure that, having regard to the purposes for which the information may lawfully be used, the information is accurate, up to date, complete, and not misleading. (3) Where an agency that holds personal information is not willing to correct that information in accordance with a request by the individual concerned, the agency shall, if so requested by the individual concerned, take such steps (if any) as are reasonable in the circumstances to attach to the information, in such a manner that it will always be read with the information, any statement provided by that individual of the correction sought. (4) Where the agency has taken steps under subclause (2) or subclause (3) of this principle, the agency shall, if reasonably practicable, inform each person or body or agency to whom the personal information has been disclosed of those steps. (5) Where an agency receives a request made pursuant to subclause (1) of this principle, the agency shall inform the individual concerned of the action taken as a result of the request. -----Original Message----- From: owner-nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:owner-nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz]On Behalf Of Greg Clare Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2001 1:23 p.m. To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: RE: IDG article. Does this mean that what was originally reported and quoted as having been said by someone, has now been edited and changed? Does this constitute creative reporting? By chance does the article include an addendum to state that it has since been edited due to people or terms being mis-quoted... for the archive of course ;) Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Lyall [mailto:simon.lyall(a)ihug.co.nz] > Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2001 12:46 pm > To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz > Subject: IDG article. > > > Looks like they have gone through and changed all the mentions of > "newsgroups" to "mailing list" and changed other stuff around. > > This includes the the stuff in quotes. > > -- > Simon Lyall. | Newsmaster | Work: > simon.lyall(a)ihug.co.nz > Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: > simon(a)darkmere.gen.nz > ihug, Auckland, NZ | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

IDG article.
by Simon Lyall 25 Jul '01

25 Jul '01

Looks like they have gone through and changed all the mentions of "newsgroups" to "mailing list" and changed other stuff around. This includes the the stuff in quotes. -- Simon Lyall. | Newsmaster | Work: simon.lyall(a)ihug.co.nz Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: simon(a)darkmere.gen.nz ihug, Auckland, NZ | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

2 1

RE: IDG article.
by Greg Clare 25 Jul '01

25 Jul '01

Does this mean that what was originally reported and quoted as having been said by someone, has now been edited and changed? Does this constitute creative reporting? By chance does the article include an addendum to state that it has since been edited due to people or terms being mis-quoted... for the archive of course ;) Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Lyall [mailto:simon.lyall(a)ihug.co.nz] > Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2001 12:46 pm > To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz > Subject: IDG article. > > > Looks like they have gone through and changed all the mentions of > "newsgroups" to "mailing list" and changed other stuff around. > > This includes the the stuff in quotes. > > -- > Simon Lyall. | Newsmaster | Work: > simon.lyall(a)ihug.co.nz > Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: > simon(a)darkmere.gen.nz > ihug, Auckland, NZ | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

prefix list update
by James Tyson 25 Jul '01

25 Jul '01

Can all Attica's BGP peers please update their filters: ip prefix-list attica-networks seq 5 permit 202.180.96.0/19 ip prefix-list attica-networks seq 10 permit 202.180.64.0/18 le 19 ip prefix-list attica-networks seq 15 permit 210.55.254.0/24 ip prefix-list attica-networks seq 20 permit 210.55.5.0/24 ip prefix-list attica-networks seq 25 permit 202.50.170.0/24 ip prefix-list attica-networks seq 30 permit 202.55.111.0/24 Cheers. James Tyson --- Samizdat New Media Solutions --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

3 5

RE: xtra rejecting mail from mailing lists?
by Jeremy Clyma 25 Jul '01

25 Jul '01

At 08:17 26/07/2001 +1200, Tech Support wrote: > >On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Simon Blake wrote: > >> I've got a mailing list on one of my servers that appears to have a > >> bunch of xtra subscribers on it. Postings to the list get sent to about > >> the first 10 xtra users, and then I start getting: > >I had someone come up to me with this too. > >Apparently when they rang up the helpdesk about it they were told > >it wasn't xtra's problem. All I did was suggest they forward the > >bounce to postmaster(a)xtra hoping someone does read email there. > > > >With the 2 examples I saw, it was bouncing emails sent to domains that > >were not hosted at xtra. However emails were sent by xtra customers > >using xtra's smtp server. One of them tried xtra's smtp server after > >they had a problem sending from their own in-house smtp server (thus > >eliminating perhaps a possible problem with their server). > > > >I'll try to get the actual bounce emailed to me. I think it said > >something about being unable to relay email > > > >Lin > >Hmmm, perhaps Xtra subscribe to ORBS, and have blacklisted their own >server..... ;) /sv_tui_ad Yeah. Right. Looks like its a transient error, one which could be caused by the backoff limits we've got in place. Simon, do you know how many concurrent smtp connections was your server attempting to open? --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0

Fwd: 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..' (fwd)
by n.brownlee＠auckland.ac.nz 25 Jul '01

25 Jul '01

Hello all: You might find this article interesting reading ... Cheers, Nevil ------------------------------------------------------------- Nevil Brownlee Internet Researcher Phone: (858) 534 8338 CAIDA, San Diego ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:35:37 -0700 From: k claffy <kc(a)caida.org> To: nanog(a)nanog.org Cc: caida(a)caida.org Subject: 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..' david moore's analysis of code red: episode 0/1 is at http://www.caida.org/analysis/security/code-red/ [funded by DARPA's ITO office NGI/NMS programs, NSF ANIR, and CAIDA members, david a caida PI] definitely check out jeff brown's animation at bottom; watch carefully around 15:00 for pretty ominous elbow in infection rate (get an epidemiologist to look at it without telling them what it is...) 360,000 machines (well, IP addresses) infected in under 14 hours. from conclusion: // ..in the final analysis, we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck, rather than proactive diligence, maintains the stability of the Internet infrastructure. // it goes without saying that many hosts are still vulnerable. and will likely remain so (to this or the next poison) until our luck runs out. do we expect the next version to have the two weaknesses christopher pointed out today? do we expect the next version won't clear every 3rd bit on the hard drive? almost makes me wonder if some white hat might (should?) have been behind CodeRed as some 'vaccination' attempt. "The bad news is, nobody will do anything about critical infrastructure protection until there's a global catastrophic failure," said Rasch. The good news is, there will be a global catastrophic failure." -- http://www.nando.net/technology/story/44887p-694372c.html the worse news is: protecting 'critical infrastructure' is far from enough. again from http://www.caida.org/analysis/security/code-red/ This assault also demonstrates that machines operated by home users or small businesses (hosts less likely to be maintained by a professional sysadmin) are integral to the robustness of the global Internet. As is the case with biologically active pathogens, vulnerable hosts can and do put everyone at risk, regardless of the significance of their role in the population. fwiw, caida trying to do gentle survey of patching speed, see http://worm-security-survey.caida.org/ k ps: john maddog hall (linux int'l) had a great slide a few months ago at UCSD talk; upshot something like INSTALLED BASE (EARTH) + 20 million linux systems + 450 million gates licenses ==> 4.4 - 6.6 % of the population total ... world population: ~6B ==> 5.4 billion people haven't selected an OS yet [k: maybe we can get them on OS-antioxidants before it's too late] --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog

1 0