- NZNOG - lists.nznog.org

WIC-1ADSL?
by Craig Spiers 15 Jun '06

15 Jun '06

Anyone out there got any wic-1adsl cards for 1700/2600/3600 series routers available? Cheers

1 0

Anyone from or know anyone at: Moebius Systems Ltd ...?
by Matthew Sullivan 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

Anyone on here responsible for: inetnum: 202.37.129.0 - 202.37.129.255 netname: MOEBIUS-NZ descr: Moebius Systems Ltd descr: Auckland country: NZ admin-c: JM113-AP tech-c: JM113-AP status: ASSIGNED PORTABLE mnt-by: APNIC-HM mnt-by: MNT-HIST-NZT-MOEBIUS-NON-NZ or anyone know this twit: Registrant Contact: SitesOnline Warwick Berg (soa(a)soa.net) +64.800943268 Fax: +64.75723129 P O Box 4556 Mt Maunganui, 3002 NZ ... he manages a server (202.37.129.44) and just spent a great amount ot time insulting me, and telling me how the message I gave him (that I recorded as spam here) didn't actually originate from his server (which must mean someone is faking my logs as well as the headers?!?!?!) and not actually doing anything about the fact his server is spewing 419 scam emails... If anyone can shed any light on the issue or the admin there, please contact me. Thanks, Matthew (BCC'd to the netblock registrant just incase it is still a live address)

5 7

Re: [nznog] Anyone from or know anyone at: Moebius Systems Ltd ...?
by Ewen McNeill 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

In message <1150318480.2779.3.camel(a)agree-17>, Glen Eustace writes: >On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 08:02 +1200, Justin Cook wrote: >> He's offering Squirrelmail. I've seen squirrelmail used to relay spam >> lately (some of it using my domain as the return address, grr.) [...] > >We have been a victim of this several times in the last couple of months. It's not just squirrelmail either. I have a client with a webmail system that has been abused in a similar manner to send spam. In that case it appears that the spammers have created "legitimate" webmail mailboxes, and then used some automated tool as a way of injecting their messages in bulk. They've been closing the accounts and blocking the origin IPs as they find them, but it's been a bit of a case of whack-a-mole. They're working on other measures to block the spam/spammers. I must admit being surprised that the spammers aren't content using 0wn3d Microsoft Windows boxes as there's enough of those out there (and/or waiting to be 0wn3d). But perhaps the going rate for renting them is now too high. Or maybe outbound port 25 blocking is having some effect (much as I wish it weren't necessary to resort to that). Ewen

4 3

Spam filtering
by John 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

Hello all. Anyone have any expereince with Postfix + Dspam + Clam AV ? How well do these work together? Cheers.

3 2

Notification of NZRR Database changes
by NZRR Database Notifications 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

Dear Colleague, This is to notify you that some object(s) in NZRR database which you either maintain or are listed as to-be-notified have been added, deleted or changed. These objects are used to configure the various NZIX route servers (http://nzix.net/) so you can expect the relevant servers to be reloaded in the near future. The reloading of the servers is staggered over a period of time so that if you are peering with both servers at an exchange, you can maintain at least one BGP session at all times and consequently a full set of routes. --- OBJECT BELOW CREATED: aut-num: AS38037 as-name: NZRR-AS38037 descr: InternetNZ descr: WIX peering at '202.7.0.158' descr: see Citylink RT job #5932 admin-c: RPA1-NZRR tech-c: RPA1-NZRR import: from AS9439 accept ANY AND NOT fltr-bogons export: to AS9439 announce AS38037 notify: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net notify: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz notify: noc(a)fx.net.nz mnt-by: MAINT-NZRR-NZ changed: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net 20060615 source: NZRR --- OBJECT BELOW CREATED: route-set: AS9439:RS-ROUTES:AS38037 descr: Route set advertised to AS9439 by InternetNZ - AS38037 members: 202.46.176.0/21^21-29, 131.203.101.48/28^28-29 admin-c: RPA1-NZRR tech-c: RPA1-NZRR notify: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net notify: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz notify: noc(a)fx.net.nz mnt-by: MAINT-NZRR-NZ changed: rpsl-admin(a)nzix.net 20060615 source: NZRR

1 0

ISP for IP?
by greminn＠gmail.com 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

Hi there, I have an ip address of 203.167.252.27, can anyone enlighten me as to which ISP this is attached too? I think its TelstraClear, and it looks to be on the end of a wireless link of some sorted (really long final trace hop)?? Thanks Simon

9 10

SORBS and Dynamic/Static listings.
by Matthew Sullivan 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

All, Sorry this is possibly a little off topic (it might also be on topic - depends on your view point). If anyone still has unresolved SORBS listings regarding static space listed as dynamic please to submit them to the support system - I have 56 tickets outstanding that have not been resolved - I personally have resolved over 1200 tickets in the past 3-4 days and the queues are finally back to normal (we were at 4000 outstanding tickets 2 weeks ago). For obvious reasons off list please. Regards, Mat

1 0

Re: [nznog] NZ Akamai Contacts
by James Brunskill 13 Jun '06

13 Jun '06

You can't complain about 0ms ping time though! 17 61.213.191.201 a61-213-191-201.deploy.akamaitechnologies.com 0ms :) James ________________________________________ From: Jonathan Brewer [mailto:jon.brewer(a)araneo.net.nz] Sent: Wednesday, 14 June 2006 11:00 a.m. To: nznog(a)list.waikato.ac.nz Subject: [nznog] NZ Akamai Contacts Hi Folks, Anyone with Akamai contacts watching NZNOG today? I'd like to help them sort out geographic locations of IP address blocks. I think our distributed content should probably not be coming from Japan via the US. :-) 1 210.48.101.113 ip-210-48-101-113.iconz.net.nz 15ms 2 210.48.49.65 f3-0-2.core1.wlg.iconz.net.nz 31ms 3 210.48.118.39 f4-0-4.core1.akl.iconz.net.nz 31ms 4 202.14.100.254 f0-0.gw2.akl.iconz.net.nz 31ms 5 210.48.1.1 f0-0-sl-br-01a.akl.iconz.net 78ms 6 203.222.35.197 sl-gw1-auk-6-0-1.sprintlink.net 78ms 7 203.222.33.22 sl-bb21-syd-1-1.sprintlink.net 94ms 8 203.222.32.49 sl-bb21-syd-14-1.sprintlink.net 109ms 9 144.232.8.130 sl-bb21-sj-3-2.sprintlink.net 250ms 10 144.232.3.210 sl-bb25-sj-12-0.sprintlink.net 265ms 11 144.232.9.240 sl-st21-sj-12-0.sprintlink.net 250ms 12 144.232.19.22 unknown 250ms 13 129.250.5.61 xe-0-1-0.r20.mlpsca01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net 250ms 14 129.250.4.42 p64-1-3-0.r20.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net 297ms 15 61.213.162.238 xe-0-0-0.a20.tokyjp01.jp.ra.gin.ntt.net 297ms 16 61.213.162.74 ge-3-0-0.a08.tokyjp01.jp.ra.gin.ntt.net 297ms 17 61.213.191.201 a61-213-191-201.deploy.akamaitechnologies.com 0ms Cheers, Jon ------------------------- Araneo Limited 230B Left Bank 116 Cuba Street Wellington 6011 Ph: 04 978 7350 Fx: 04 978 7355 Mb: 021 345 054 http://www.araneo.net.nz/ -------------------------

1 0

NZ Akamai Contacts
by Jonathan Brewer 13 Jun '06

13 Jun '06

Hi Folks, Anyone with Akamai contacts watching NZNOG today? I'd like to help them sort out geographic locations of IP address blocks. I think our distributed content should probably not be coming from Japan via the US. :-) 1 210.48.101.113 ip-210-48-101-113.iconz.net.nz 15ms 2 210.48.49.65 f3-0-2.core1.wlg.iconz.net.nz 31ms 3 210.48.118.39 f4-0-4.core1.akl.iconz.net.nz 31ms 4 202.14.100.254 f0-0.gw2.akl.iconz.net.nz 31ms 5 210.48.1.1 f0-0-sl-br-01a.akl.iconz.net 78ms 6 203.222.35.197 sl-gw1-auk-6-0-1.sprintlink.net 78ms 7 203.222.33.22 sl-bb21-syd-1-1.sprintlink.net 94ms 8 203.222.32.49 sl-bb21-syd-14-1.sprintlink.net 109ms 9 144.232.8.130 sl-bb21-sj-3-2.sprintlink.net 250ms 10 144.232.3.210 sl-bb25-sj-12-0.sprintlink.net 265ms 11 144.232.9.240 sl-st21-sj-12-0.sprintlink.net 250ms 12 144.232.19.22 unknown 250ms 13 129.250.5.61 xe-0-1-0.r20.mlpsca01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net 250ms 14 129.250.4.42 p64-1-3-0.r20.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net 297ms 15 61.213.162.238 xe-0-0-0.a20.tokyjp01.jp.ra.gin.ntt.net 297ms 16 61.213.162.74 ge-3-0-0.a08.tokyjp01.jp.ra.gin.ntt.net 297ms 17 61.213.191.201 a61-213-191-201.deploy.akamaitechnologies.com 0ms Cheers, Jon ------------------------- Araneo Limited 230B Left Bank 116 Cuba Street Wellington 6011 Ph: 04 978 7350 Fx: 04 978 7355 Mb: 021 345 054 http://www.araneo.net.nz/ -------------------------

3 2

Re: [nznog] Fwd: PHONE SERVICES AFFECTED BY POWER OUTAGES
by yuri 13 Jun '06

13 Jun '06

On 12/06/06, Dean Pemberton wrote: > Heh - Well I had assumed that peoples phones (cordless aside) would > still work if their power was dead. > I was also assuming that people weren't going to be calling Telecom to > see when their power was coming back on =) My phone (West Melton, Rural Canterbury near Christchurch) was dead for most of Monday. I assumed the battery in the exchange or mux box must've died. I'm not sure how long the exchange batteries last, but power was off for a long time (30+ hours). Yuri

1 0