And FWIW I agree, and thanks to those who emailed me offlist with similar
echoed comments. :P
My thinking was.
1) I dont like the use of Fraudulent Credit Cards regardless of who theyre
being used with...
2) If The ISP is deemed to be the appropriate contact for a genuine crime
then.. well.. *shrug*
Of course the logical cause of action is obvious, but then again, when the
NZCC have already pretty much told you what they think of you, its not
suprising that the appropriate authorities havnt yet been invoked... ?
At 01:21 p.m. 17/10/2002 +1300, Glen Wilson wrote:
>The stick approach always has postive results.
>
>Glen Wilson
>Senior Engineer and Administrator
>Network Operations Shift Supervisor
>Ihug, Auckland, New Zealand
>
>On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Steve Phillips wrote:
>
> > At 13:03 17/10/2002 +1300, Mark Foster wrote:
> > >This stuff strikes me as obvious enough - as a sysadmin I would expect a
> > >lot of this is fairly logical proceedure for dealing with network abuse.
> >
> > He runs one of the biggest SPAM/MLM schemes in New Zealand, so its not
> > surprising he doesn't know how "whois" works and doesn't trust that a
> > remote ISP will actually respond to "abuse@" complaints (hell, we know HIS
> > one didn't eh seeby ?)
> >
> > Maybe he just needs to be beaten about the head a few times with a very
> > large clue stick.
> >
> > --
> > Steve.
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
> > where the body of your message reads:
> > unsubscribe nznog
> >
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
>where the body of your message reads:
>unsubscribe nznog
-
To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
where the body of your message reads:
unsubscribe nznog
