Hi Dave and Jonathan
I highly recommend you contact them and see what their approach is in regards to the protection of vile sites. I suspect you may be somewhat disappointed by their response, or perhaps you won't be.
They protect *ALL* of the most utterly vile content on the internet including the chans and a number of other vile sites I won't mention.
Other WAFs/CDNs such as AWS Cloudfront, Akamai, Fastly, MaxCDN, Project Shield don't seem to have this problem as they have an AUP and appear to enforce it.
I made the mistake of attempting to use their abuse form to be then doxed as the company who runs the site is the same as the person who runs the hosting infrastructure on one of the sites actively hosting and promoting the video and manifesto. I haven't received any response from Cloudflare after I attempted to contact them saying I was doxed because I was following their process.
It's my view Cloudflares role in providing DDoS mitigation on sites is to also have an acceptable use policy. Their lack of AUP speaks volumes about where they place that importance on if anything is unacceptable.
Appreciate your opinion Jonathan, I have asked InternetNZ the same question but wondered if there was a view from NZNOG too.
Cheers
Peter