Re: [nznog] MX2 with SPF

On 30/10/2005 1:31 p.m., Joel van Velden wrote:

Because of various reasons we are using an ISPs seconday mx server for our domains, and thus have no control of that servers configuation.

Essentially regardless of the merits or otherwise of spf this is not sufficient, you either need to have your secondary(ies) with identical configs to the primary or just not have any. You can find a lot of references to this in google, for example http://aplawrence.com/Words2005/2005_04_03.html Apart from less spam, the other benefit of no secondaries is that when your primary goes down people sending you mail find out that you haven't received it. -- Robert Gray bob(a)brockhurst.co.nz