Joe Abley wrote:
Anybody who doesn't incorporate such policy into their network presumably doesn't care how much it costs (or how long it takes) to deliver a packet, and hence it doesn't matter which way the packets go. Assuming that any of this matters, customers of such an ISP will presumably migrate elsewhere naturally, and the problem (from the perspective of the AS originating the routes) will solve itself.
What has been lacking thus far is any objective measurement of customer experience across different ISPs. Customers are not keen to move ISPs, change email addresses, change bank APs etc if they are not assured of a better service. If ISPs would adopt some neutral measurement capture, then there would be a way to say "Blah ISP is better because they <do thing X>, and Blerg ISP is worse because they don't" Some of the work Nevil Brownlee presented at the conference could feed into this. So could the NLANR AMP stuff (now many ISPs have this deployed again?). Even the nzdsl speed test stuff. I don't know if there is a speedtest server on the WIX/APE, but if there were then you'd be able to get a good appreciation of how the different ISPs fared when it came to a similar service. Dean