2Day Chief Enthusiast wrote:
Typically why people do this is to keep score, and we have no evidence that people have used this information for malicious purposes thus far.
If you have no evidence of misuse of data, then why propose a change to the status quo?
The reasoning is that changes to pivacy legislation call the ability to perform zone transfers without restriction into question. The European Union in particular are starting to push very hard about data-privacy compliance issues. So the objective of this exercise is to pre-empt any regulatory cause for concern within, and without NZ, and continue with a workable, diverse system that equitably supports the needs of EVERYONE, both net administrators and users. The NOG as a whole, suggesting a regulatory framework is much more preferable to Parliamentarians imposing a set of regulations upon the NZ internet. Personal Opinion on:==================================== I don't want an Internet in NZ, regulated like China, Singapore or Australia. Personal Opinion off:=================================== Rgds Roger De Salis
But the information does contain personal information,
Ok, lets take an example:-
The .co.nz zone file has more than a few resource records in it. Which records in particular contain the "personal information" you speak about?
Post an example to this list so I can understand your concern.
regards
Peter Mott Chief Enthusiast 2Day Internet Limited http://www.2day.net.nz -/-
--------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
-- \_ Roger De Salis Cisco Systems NZ Ltd