Arron/Sandy,
You people seem to be advertising an awful lot of crap to us over NZIX;
the following is an example (209.155.82.18 is ftp.cdrom.com):
ba1.acld#ping ftp.cdrom.com
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 209.155.82.18, timeout is 2 seconds:
.!!..
Success rate is 40 percent (2/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1108/1388/1668 ms
ba1.acld#show ip route 209.155.82.18
Routing entry for 209.155.82.18/32
Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 5000
Tag 9999, type extern 2, forward metric 100
Redistributing via ospf 1
Last update from 203.97.1.70 on ATM5/0.1, 1d00h ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 203.97.1.70, from 203.97.1.82, 1d00h ago, via ATM5/0.1
Route metric is 5000, traffic share count is 1
ba1.acld#traceroute 209.155.82.18
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to wcarchive.cdrom.com (209.155.82.18)
1 ba1-ser0-15.hmtn.clix.net.nz (203.97.1.70) 32 msec 12 msec 16 msec
2 ngthn1-b1.nzix.waikato.ac.nz (140.200.128.9) [AS 681] 136 msec 20 msec 28 msec
3 s6-1.akcr1.netgate.net.nz (202.37.245.125) [AS 4648] 36 msec 32 msec 28 msec
4 f0-0.akbr1.netgate.net.nz (202.37.245.58) [AS 4648] 2144 msec * *
5
This seems bad!
Anybody else seeing this?
I will be blocking OSPF updates from NetGate over NZIX very shortly...
Any feedback or confirmation from anybody else would be most welcome.
Joe
--
Joe Abley