
Though one thing to note is that HTTP servers might not fit the definition of under the Act http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2011/0011/latest/whole.html#DLM276... “file sharing is where— “(a) material is uploaded via, or downloaded from, the Internet using an application or network that enables the simultaneous sharing of material between multiple users; and “(b) uploading and downloading may, but need not, occur at the same time Though just thinking some more in addition to HTTP GET there is also HTTP POST so yeah could fit. Notice that description could fit an email server. And could add an email signature that said something like: ©2011 David Robinson Please note I (David Robinson) am the copyright holder of this email/file(s) (expect where stated otherwise e.g. quoted sections). This email is only for the people listed in the To, CC or BCC fields. You may not share this email/file(s) outside that group be it electronically, verbally, visually, physically or by any other means. You may not forward or share this email/file(s) with any other email addresses even others you may control or those of your staff. If you do share this copyrighted work you are in breach of my copyright over this work. If you wish to share this work you can contact me for my express permission and license. The base license fee is NZ$15000 per person shared with. And then send to emails that autoforward or were staff reply. Let me think name(a)national.org.nz auto forwards to a @parliment.govt.nz address for ministers. On 5 September 2011 15:37, Paul Brislen <Paul(a)tuanz.org.nz> wrote:
I'm happy to pay for the first notice ($25) so we can see where this leads.
If we get a couple more you've got your three strikes I would think. Then we can take it to the Tribunal.
-----Original Message----- From: nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Mark Harris Sent: Monday, 5 September 2011 3:22 p.m. To: NZNOG Subject: Re: [nznog] An Experiment of Copyright? .
On 5/09/11 2:56 PM, Craig Whitmore wrote:
I personally can't see how this new law protects small rights holders at all.
After all that's gone down, I would be surprised if anyone honestly thought it did. But you raise some substantial matters that should be placed in front of the Minister responsible, Mr Simon Power, before he disappears from accountability at the election.
Let MPs know that this IS an election issue, and remember that only the Greens voted against it at the time. ;-)
~mark _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog _______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog