Juha and all, Juha Saarinen wrote:
:: So how many people were worried that I could see their Vlans :: from the street?
Dean's such a nice guy so...
Still, WEP stands for "wire equivalency protocol", doesn't it? Ergo, perhaps it's silly to expect it to be any more secure than Cat5?
Is IPsec really the best solution here, considering it has problems in NAT'ed environments?
I would recommend against IPsec at this time. I have done 4 implementations. It is quite expensive and time consuming not to mention a administration nightmare if you are not very careful...
-- Juha
--------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!) CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1(a)ix.netcom.com Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208 --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog