What about something like <a href="http://www.opengatedata.com/systems/sitex-ec/network-switch-cooling/">http://www.opengatedata.com/systems/sitex-ec/network-switch-cooling/</a>?<br><br>I know it may not be the best, but sure it beats swapping out perfectly good switches with new kit just to solve an airflow issue.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On 30 August 2011 16:40, Simon Lyall <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:simon@darkmere.gen.nz">simon@darkmere.gen.nz</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
I&#39;m having a little problem with exhaust ports of some of my Cisco switches going in the wrong direction so my servers in the same rack are ingesting the hot air from the switches.<br>
<br>
Corp standard for 1RU switches is 2960s but it would appear that 2360s are what I probably want since they are &quot;Layer-2 top of rack&quot; targeted and have reversible airflow.<br>
<br>
Just wondering if (a) I can get reversible airflow in 2960s or (b) what is the main difference between the models? Tried finding a comparison page but nothing so far.<br><font color="#888888">
<br>
-- <br>
Simon Lyall �| �Very Busy �| �Web: <a href="http://www.darkmere.gen.nz/" target="_blank">http://www.darkmere.gen.nz/</a><br>
&quot;To stay awake all night adds a day to your life&quot; - Stilgar | eMT.<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
NZNOG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz" target="_blank">NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz</a><br>
<a href="http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog" target="_blank">http://list.waikato.ac.nz/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/nznog</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>