7 Nov
2013
7 Nov
'13
1:18 p.m.
On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:33 AM, Tony Wicks <tony(a)wicks.co.nz> wrote:
Not that I'm saying that NAT is the appropriate solution, if you are having "NAT fall over whenever some attacker breathes a few packets across it" then you are doing it waaaay wrong.
It's easy to cause NATs to tip over due to state-exhaustion. There's no way to do it 'right', heh. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins(a)arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton