Hi Scott,
Sorry if I'm being blond, but that didn't answer my question.
I am trying to figure out where to point the finger and I don't
understand enough of what you posted for me to understand if this
is my problem as the mail admin or the vic mail admin?
I don't have a function to just whitelist the uni, so if people
think that tinyspf is not working correctly then I'll just stop
using it.
Sorry that my initial question was not very clear.
D
On 10/09/2012 12:52 p.m., Scott Howard wrote:
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Don Gould <don@bowenvale.co.nz>
wrote:
2. Should I be doing something to change my config or do
others feel that the vuw spf record is to wide?
From
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4408#section-10.1
:
SPF implementations MUST limit the number of mechanisms
and modifiers
that do DNS lookups to at most 10 per SPF check,
including any
lookups caused by the use of the "include" mechanism or
the
"redirect" modifier. If this number is exceeded during a
check, a
PermError MUST be returned. The "include", "a", "mx",
"ptr", and
"exists" mechanisms as well as the "redirect" modifier do
count
against this limit. The "all", "ip4", and "ip6"
mechanisms do not
require DNS lookups and therefore do not count against
this limit.
The "exp" modifier does not count against this limit
because the DNS
lookup to fetch the explanation string occurs after the
SPF record
has been evaluated.
Scott
--
Don Gould
31 Acheson Ave
Mairehau
Christchurch, New Zealand
Ph: + 64 3 348 7235
Mobile: + 64 21 114 0699