On 17/03/11 Thu, Mar 17, 15:49, Nathan Ward wrote:
Sixxs are as native as HE.
And they have the advantage that they have a node in Wellington to RTTs are as good and often better. From a host in Wellington with the IPv6 tunneled via sixxs. $ ping6 psg.com PING psg.com(psg.com) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from psg.com: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=159 ms 64 bytes from psg.com: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=160 ms 64 bytes from psg.com: icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=159 ms 64 bytes from psg.com: icmp_seq=4 ttl=53 time=159 ms ^C --- psg.com ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 4 received, 20% packet loss, time 4004ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 159.189/159.725/160.008/0.319 ms $ ping psg.com PING psg.com (147.28.0.62) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from psg.com (147.28.0.62): icmp_req=1 ttl=49 time=155 ms 64 bytes from psg.com (147.28.0.62): icmp_req=2 ttl=49 time=156 ms 64 bytes from psg.com (147.28.0.62): icmp_req=3 ttl=49 time=155 ms 64 bytes from psg.com (147.28.0.62): icmp_req=4 ttl=49 time=155 ms 64 bytes from psg.com (147.28.0.62): icmp_req=5 ttl=49 time=155 ms 64 bytes from psg.com (147.28.0.62): icmp_req=6 ttl=49 time=156 ms ^C --- psg.com ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 6144ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 155.242/155.657/156.465/0.567 ms