On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Jeremy Visser wrote:
On 6/11/2013 10:26, Matt Richards wrote:
perhaps you need the new space to host a bunch of HTTPS web sites, which don't currently exist?
With Windows XP due to be EOL'ed in April 2014 (less than 6 months away), and market share at 31% and falling, [0] is HTTPS *still* a justifiable reason to be hoarding IPv4 space?
It is not just Windows XP that doesn't support SNI, more details here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication#Support and specificly RHEL/Centos 5.x doesn't support SNI: http://centoshelp.org/security/apache-httpd-with-ssl-https-secure-socket-lay... -- Simon Lyall | Very Busy | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz/ "To stay awake all night adds a day to your life" - Stilgar | eMT.