On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Michael Fincham <michael@unleash.co.nz> wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 16:52:04 +1300, Dave Mill wrote:
> I've obtained some
> pcaps from both ends and I can see the following changes occurring to a
> DHCP Request:
>
> 1) The transaction ID is changed
> 2) Option 82 is added. More specifically, sub-option 1 Agent Circuit ID is
> present and has a valid length. sub-option 2 Agent Remote ID is present,
> has a length of 0 and no content which wireshark doesn't seem to like much.

Do you know if the circuit was ordered with the "DHCP option"?

Why should a layer 2 circuit need to have such an option? There's no mention of DHCP in:

http://www.crownfibre.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Chorus-UFB-Services-Agreement-Service-Description-for-Bitstream-3A.pdf��