There are many nuanced differences in the services, hardware and implementations between the LFCs.

 

We don���t test each others networks, so I cant tell you what they all are. Sorry!



From: Neil Gardner <nznog@neilnz.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2020 10:13 AM
To: Brent Marquis <Brent.Marquis@chorus.co.nz>
Cc: Peter Lambrechtsen <peter@crypt.co.nz>; Jason Orchard <Jason.Orchard@enable.net.nz>; nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz
Subject: Re: [nznog] Re: NZ Working From Home Traffic Profile

 

 

 

On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 10:02, Brent Marquis <Brent.Marquis@chorus.co.nz> wrote:

I agree with the opinion that upstream is unlikely to be an issue.

[snip]

  1. Upstream queuing/shaping to get onto the PON segment is actually useful, as the 500mbps policer on the other side (required for us to mean SLAs) is not TCP friendly, if CPEs aren���t shaping to the actual plan rate

What an interesting comment! I wonder if this would have any real world impact on upstream performance on FibreMAX plans - or if one might observe difference performance between Chorus and other LFCs?

 

Cheers- N

 

The content of this email (including any attachments) is intended for the addressee only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you���ve received this email in error, you shouldn���t read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any of the content of this email . No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mis-transmission or error. This communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of Part 4 of the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017. Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or its attachments.