Re: [nznog] Don't quite get this?

What could be an interesting experiment to do would be to have two connections. Connection 1 has just the router, no computer etc. Connection 2 injects connection 1's IP address into a bunch of Trackers. Wait for connection 1 to get notices even though it did no sharing. Along the lines of http://dmca.cs.washington.edu/index.html where printers got dmca notices. Dave On 2 September 2011 09:35, Paul Brislen wrote:

I would very much like to see this level of independent input from a volunteer team. Otherwise it really will bowl down to one person's word against the other.

Sent from my iPhone

On 2/09/2011, at 9:27 AM, "Jay Daley" wrote:

...

On 2/09/2011, at 9:07 AM, Paul Brislen wrote:

...

I don't know if the tribunal would be able to understand the argument from a technical point of view but yes, you'll need to prove what you were doing at that specific time was legit.

In my previous job I received many complaints from specialist contractors working on behalf of rights holders (relating to domain names not downloading) and they always demonstrated poor technical competency by those contractors.

I doubt this has improved and so it is likely that a thorough examination of the technical details of the complaint will turn up significant flaws in the way they complaint has been generated.

It would be useful if there were a volunteer team ready to conduct this examination that the first set of accused could call on.  That way we might be able to discredit the methodology at an early stage.

Jay

-- Jay Daley Chief Executive .nz Registry Services (New Zealand Domain Name Registry Limited) desk: +64 4 931 6977 mobile: +64 21 678840

_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog