Bruce Harding wrote:
It's not so much that they are inaccurate, as that they are woefully out of date, If they are going to publish a blacklist, then they have a responsibility to keep it current.
I understand this. But they do accurately list a phenominal number of spam sources. From my experience, they get far more right than they get wrong, which is why i still believe, weighting your tagging based on their information is still better than not using them at all. Would I use then as the only source? No. Would I take what they publish as gospel? No. But I will take on board the information they publish.
So a number of ISPs dont update their rdns often, this is the fault of sorbs how?
The rdns info they are currently using to block a number of our address ranges date back to november 2005.
I take back that comment then :)