On 1/08/2012 5:19 p.m., James Spenceley wrote:

I think the proposed path by PF was potentially a few ms (~5-8ms) faster than the existing cable.

That's what I was told too, the lower latency courtesy of a somewhat shorter/straighter physical path.

Anyway, I asked Southern Cross about pricing and more. Here's the story with their response:

http://www.itnews.com.au/News/310541,pacific-fibre-folds-submarine-cable-plans-scrapped.aspx

Hei kon�� mai,
--
Juha Saarinen AITTP
juha.saarinen.org

��

Follow me on

Twitter