Not a bad rule. It was also interesting at APRICOT to hear carriers within the region start to get the message of: Sure you have to run LSN (Large Scale NAT). But it's expensive. And every dollar you spend on deploying IPv6 you save yourself many times that in not having to buy more expensive LSN. One gram of IPv6 == 1 kilogram of LSN On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Richard Hector <richard(a)walnut.gen.nz> wrote:
On 24/04/14 16:25, Dean Pemberton wrote:
And as a follow up to that.
ARIN announced today that they are down to their last /8 https://www.arin.net/announcements/2014/20140423.html
This means that their allocation policy changes in line with their 4 phase approach.
APNIC has called for organisations to accelerate their adoption of IPv6. http://www.apnic.net/publications/news/2014/shift-to-ipv6-to-accelerate-as-g...
Time to put some money into those billing systems eh =)
I propose a simple rule: "You can't have any more IPv4 space unless everything that's v4-addressable is also v6-addressable".
Richard
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog