You must've snipped: - (g) Politicians of any variety. ... by accident from the list. -- Juha Saarinen Google Talk: juhasaarinen(a)gmail.com Skype: juha_saarinen MSN: juha_saarinen(a)msn.com Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=12007442&trk=tab_proFacebook http://www.facebook.com/juha.saarinenFlickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/bismillah/Twitter http://twitter.com/juhasaarinen Juha's blog on Geekzone Hands on with Google Nexus One -- briefly http://www.geekzone.co.nz/juha/7097 On 17/02/2010 2:55 p.m., David Farrar wrote:
A minor correction. They are not filtering for all objectionable material, but just the sub-set which is deemed child pornography. Objectionable material is defined in s3(2) of the FVPA as:
A publication shall be deemed to be objectionable for the purposes of this Act if the publication promotes or supports, or tends to promote or support,---
· (a) The exploitation of children, or young persons, or both, for sexual purposes; or
· (b) The use of violence or coercion to compel any person to participate in, or submit to, sexual conduct; or
· (c) Sexual conduct with or upon the body of a dead person; or
· (d) The use of urine or excrement in association with degrading or dehumanising conduct or sexual conduct; or
· (e) Bestiality; or
· (f) Acts of torture or the infliction of extreme violence or extreme cruelty.
Only those that fall under (a) are subject to the filter.
DPF
