8 Dec
2005
8 Dec
'05
2:41 a.m.
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 10:05 +1300, Donald Neal wrote:
Andy Linton wrote: This thread should now turn to a technical topic or go away.
Good call. We could all consider the need to have a graceful "fail over" service. In the event that the main or a major part of a 'net presence is compromised an alternate service needs to be ready to swing into action. Rather than a 'Unable to connect to remote host.' there could/should be a plain vanilla site delivering an apology for temporary suspension of service. --- $NZ0.02 Mark.