Re: [nznog] Acceptable levels of packet loss

No SLA, hence the question. Subjectively I expect that a fibre circuit to a major provider will be delivering very low levels of loss, and very low levels of jitter. I just don't have enough knowledge of what's actually normal for a standard business fibre connection in central Auckland to quantify my "low levels". As an indication, for this month I've got peak loss of 3.5-4.5% and average ~0.08% to two different DNS servers on the provider's network. Off to an Australian host it's a similar level, but at 26ms median rtt instead of a mere 1.5ms. On 21/01/2014 15:40, Scott Pettit wrote:

What does your SLA say? If it doesn¹t specify a level of packet loss/you don¹t have an SLA but you¹re still spending lots of money then is it impacting on your performance?

-Scott

On 21/01/14 15:35, "Matthew Poole" wrote:

...

Obviously I'm seeing a non-zero level (averages are in the zero-point-something range, but some of the maximums are above 0), so want to know what people consider to be the point where I go from "unreasonable customer" to "customer with a justified concern"?

---

The content of this message and any attachments may be privileged, confidential or sensitive. Any unauthorised used is prohibited. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where stated otherwise with appropriate authority. All pricing provided is valid at the time of writing only and due to factors such as the exchange rate, may change without notice. Sales are made subject to our Terms & Conditions, available on our website or on request. ________________________________

-- Matthew Poole "The difference between theory and practice is that practice is easier in theory than theory is in practice"