Roger De Salis wrote:
The Internet NZ Council has pointed out on numerous occasasions to current holders of the keys to the asylum the extremely bad record NZ has with Lame delegations, particularly since Domainz gave up a) being the only game in town b) absolutely enforcing the requirement of dual DNS entries.
The current level of cluelessness is shameful particularly with respect to the managment of this, and the complete and utter failure to a) realise why this is important and even being aware it is a problem.
Too busy doing policy, or dreaming stupid reasons to outsource the DRS, "cos when you don't know what you are doing, anything is a risk - even breathing..."
I echo, the shame of being lame.....
Seems you should feel the shame closer to home, Roger - "As of Sunday 25 August 2003 CST, the following lame delegations were detected. The nameserver with the name is lame for this zone --------------- ------------------------------ --------------------------- -- 202.46.160.4 pubsec.domainz.net.nz 195.130.in-addr.arpa 202.46.160.4 pubsec.domainz.net.nz 216.130.in-addr.arpa 202.46.160.4 pubsec.domainz.net.nz 62.156.in-addr.arpa 202.46.160.4 pubsec.domainz.net.nz akl.adv.net.nz 202.46.160.4 pubsec.domainz.net.nz globaled.org.nz 202.46.160.4 pubsec.domainz.net.nz midcentral.co.nz 202.46.160.4 pubsec.domainz.net.nz roar.net.nz 202.46.160.4 pubsec.domainz.net.nz webfactor.co.nz 202.46.160.4 pubsec.domainz.net.nz whi.co.nz" Keith Davidson