On 19/05/06, Scott Weeks <surfer@mauigateway.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message Follows -----
> From: "Jamie Riden" < jamesr@europe.com>
>
> > > No other blacklist operates like - or generates the hate
> > > - that S(ORBS) does.
> >
> > Actually, I've seen people say that and worse about every
> > single blacklist including SBL, which is probably the most
> > conservative one, all the way back to the MAPS original.
>
> They all say that if you're not a spammer, you have to pay
> LOTS of money to people they tell you to pay to be delisted?

The DUL doesn't work like that :

"The general rules of delisting are as follows:

The Regional Internet Registry (RIR) Point of Contact (PoC) can
request a listing or delisting of any address in their space. The only
time this will be refused is when the netblock information in the RIR
or in the reverse DNS naming clearly indicates the addresses are
dynamically assigned ( e.g. 0.1.pool.example.com).

Anyone else may request delisting of addresses or netblocks provided
that reverse DNS naming is set to indicate static assignment." --
http://www.au.sorbs.net/faq/dul.shtml

Please note, I do note recommend using dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net to reject
mail. It will block 'legitimate' mail.

--
Jamie Riden / jamesr@europe.com / jamie.riden@computer.org
NZ Honeynet project - http://www.nz-honeynet.org/

_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog