1 Apr
2017
1 Apr
'17
10:28 a.m.
On 2 Apr. 2017 12:32, "Glen Eustace" <geustace(a)godzone.net.nz> wrote: I am still of the opinion that SPF is broken but seem to be fairly alone holding that opinion. Well I somewhat share your opinion. I don't think that SPF *per-se* is broken, but typical implementations definitely *are* broken. I do think that applying SPF to *inbound* relays is definitely broken. A service provider should allow customers to nominate their own inbound relays, and customer service should not be spouting obvious nonsense such as "the sender should fix their SPF". -MK