We have made a brief report which is not for
public viewing, but which has identified a small number of issues on the
Net4U network (which were quickly rectified) that were as a
result of previous employees. We found nothing that was causing
deliberate loss of bandwidth to any other party. We did not
fully complete the work due to budget restraints, however we did cover most
of the important aspects. Some of our recommendations have been
implemented, and sadly others have not been done, but Net4U are
operating somewhat better than they were.
We no
longer oversee the operation of Net4U, but have kept in touch with them,
and assist with other matters both business related and technical, and feel
Net4U & Sahil are slowly "growing up" so to speak, but I expect
mystiques will still be made from time to time. None of us are perfect.
I can
assure you the bandwidth offered by Net4U in that "distributed" email
is legitimate, and I should warn you that continued accusations and
alligations are a direct attack against me and my company, which left Net4U
operating legally and above board, and there is no justification for
this blatant deformation.
I must
say that I also disagree with the method of advertising chosen. Had I been
consulted I would have recommended against it, but in saying that,
I welcome email in my inbox that relates directly to my line of
business and would rather receive such email as opposed to the ones about
increasing the size of certain body parts or some other "amazing
offer" which we see all to often of late, depending on how good your mail
filters are.
It
doesn't take much for everyone to see that some of you are making an issue
simply because it's Sahil and Net4U, and because you were a reject at
school who was picked on and bullied, and now have a psychological
disorder resulting in you playing out the role of your boyhood deamon from
school, dishing out what you received.
Without naming anyone, I would also like to point out
that there are those of you on this list making such accusations who are the
last people to do so, or should we raise the matter of a VAST amount of
bandwidth stolen from Telecom for a number of months, by a much larger ISP than
Net4U, who even taught another ISP's network administrator how to do it only
days before Telecom figured it all out... or perhaps I could send the list
a copy of some forged court documents? To
these few people I say, I suggest you stop
stirring the pot and leave the past alone, or you will get more than just a
little of it on you.
I
think we should all take a good look at ourselves, and the motivation
behind the pettiness that from time to time, makes me wonder just how many
children play on this list, and how many people are here to get work/business
done.
Lets
just get on with our work please everyone.
Cheers,
Richard Parkinson
(Director)
Sigel
Data Systems Ltd.
If anyone had forgotten, where is the "Report" from Sigel
Systems about
Net4u's runnings over the last 3 months. I believe the
impartial 3rd party
was hired as one of net4u's staff a very short while
after (so couldn't be
impartial)
Thanks
Craig
>
>> >[snippage]
> > > We can deliver using several methods
as I've outlined above and can
also
> > > take care of
transporting your existing I.P. Address ranges supplied
to
> >
> you by your current provider to us.
>
> That would be a neat
trick. Almost worth taking him up on that just to
> watch him fail
dismally.
_______________________________________________
Nznog
mailing list
Nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog