Hello Again

 

I’ve had a few options given to me – a mixture of router based solutions vs separate appliances

 

On the router front the options given are:

Cisco ASR1k/1001s

Cisco SCE (Service Control Engines)

Juniper J2320

Mikrotik

 

And I’ve been informed that policing rather than shaping is the way to go using this type of solution

 

On the appliance front we have:

Allot NetEnforcers

Allot Sigma

http://www.allot.com/Products_Overview.html

A few people recommended these – however I did have one reply stating that the GUI is Java based and horrible

 

Sandvine DPI boxes

http://www.sandvine.com/products/traffic_management.asp

 

Exinda

http://www1.exinda.com/

 

PacketShaper

http://www.packeteer.com/

 

 

And there was one recommendation for software

http://www.dmasoftlab.com/cont/home

 

 

I’m currently leaning towards router based policing using J2320’s which should be more than enough for our needs for the foreseeable future. It’ll mean a slightly higher learning curve as I’ve only done basic JUNOS configuration before. My reasoning however is as follows

1)      Having a single box handling the routing/policing means one less box to troubleshoot if any issues arise

2)      JUNOS has a fairly logical layout, which while it takes a bit of getting used to is easier to read than ios – oh and the commit/rollback feature is also nice

3)      The JUNOS web interface – while I prefer to work at the cli (I don’t trust GUIs) the web interface is good for a quick glance to check for potential problems by those who don’t have the cli skills

4)      I need new routers anyway and have plans to redeploy my Cisco 2821s

5)      $Price$ – easier to convince the boss to sign the cheque

 

While not a contributing factor I am keen to improve my JUNOS skills, and in turn my overall routing knowledge

 

Cheers again for all those who replied

 

Kind Regards

Jodi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: nznog-bounces@list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:nznog-bounces@list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Jodi
Sent: Friday, 9 March 2012 4:44 p.m.
To: nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz
Subject: Re: [nznog] traffic shaping

 

Thanks to all who sent advice and recommendations. Time for some ‘light’ reading over the weekend

 

Hope you all enjoy yours J

 

Kind Regards

Jodi

 

From: nznog-bounces@list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:nznog-bounces@list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Jodi
Sent: Thursday, 8 March 2012 4:38 p.m.
To: nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz
Subject: [nznog] traffic shaping

 

Hi All

 

Currently we’re running a couple of Packeteers (one for each of our upstreams) to give users a fair slice of the pie. However they’re starting to wilt under the increased load and it’s time to look at replacing.

 

I’ve been looking around at some of the more popular appliances that I am aware of (Packeteer, Exinda, Netequalizer), however I don’t want to buy a lemon.

 

The other thought was to shape directly on the routers – have a couple of Cisco 2821’s at our borders. I’m familiar with the shaping process but have never attempted on Cisco kit before so don’t want to start down that path if it’s the wrong way to go (especially as I would be the only one who could manage it and I like the occasional day off).

 

My main focus to is to shape at the border by IP for different classes based on our plans e.g. burst to 4meg, 2meg dedicated, 2.5 burst to 10, etc

Secondary to that is reporting and 3rdly QoS

 

Any and all advice welcome, on and off list

 

Cheers

Jodi

 

--

Jodi Thomson       

Network & Systems Engineer

Description: Description: Wasp New Zealand

Ph                            +64-6-8355800 

Fax                          +64-6-8355811

Mob                        +64-21-903712

E-Mail   jodi@team.waspnet.co.nz

www.waspnet.co.nz