On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Jodi
<jodi@team.waspnet.co.nz> wrote:
> >
> > The SRX seems to me to be more a firewall than a router. I've got
> > Netscreen's handling access to services (reasonably proficient at
> > ScreenOS). I don't need firewall/IDP at the border just routing and
> > policing/shaping
>
> The J2320 is slower and about 2.5 times the price of the SRX220H (looking at
> RRP at a local distributor).
>
> The J2320 holds more BGP routes - but only 400k which is less than the global
> table right now so it's kind of a moot point.
> J2320 can also do 32 BGP peers while the SRX can only do 16.
> Other than that, for a small scale router the SRX is great.
>
> I run BGP signaled VPLS and L3VPNs with RSVP and IS-IS on the SRX just fine -
> there are no routing features sacrificed in favour of firewall features.
> It all runs JunOS.
>
> --
Cool I shall take a closer looksee :)
Cheers
JT