I find it interesting that whatever the failure of SxC was that not
everyone was affected and infect our upstream had no glitch to AU or USA
to any of our monitoring points. Seems like the impact people are seeing
with some carriers may be Business/Architectural in nature rather than
some world ending SxC failure
--
Tristram Cheer
Network Architect - Most problems are the result of previous
solutions...
Tel. 09 438 5472 Ext 803 | Mobile. 022 412 1985 | PO Box 5083,
Whangarei, 0140
tristram.cheer(a)ubergroup.co.nz mailto:tristram.cheer(a)ubergroup.co.nz
|www.ubergroup.co.nz http://www.ubergroup.co.nz
http://ubergroup.co.nz/fb https://twitter.com/#!/ubergroupltd
From: nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
[mailto:nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Tim Price
Sent: Friday, 9 November 2012 3:35 p.m.
To: 'nznog'
Subject: Re: [nznog] Labour alleges failure of Southern Cross Cable
Except for where resiliency was down due to previously scheduled
maintenance... Certainly wasn't seamless from my point of view. But
yes, Clare Curran needs to GTFO
From: nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz
[mailto:nznog-bounces(a)list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Sam Russell
Sent: Friday, 9 November 2012 3:27 p.m.
To: Al Twohill
Cc: nznog
Subject: Re: [nznog] Labour alleges failure of Southern Cross Cable
Presumably a redundant link means that nobody loses service when they
accidentally break one of them?
It does seem like an excuse to blame National for not propping up
Pacific Fibre, rather than anything wrong with a redundant set of links
failing over correctly due to a fault, as designed
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 9, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Al Twohill
