26 Sep
2003
26 Sep
'03
7:28 p.m.
On Friday, Sep 26, 2003, at 22:12 Canada/Eastern, DPF wrote:
(Nobody would endure a spam filtering service which had a 20% false positive rate, so the only natural conclusion to draw is that the opt-in messages which are blocked aren't considered false positives by the subscribers to those spam filtering services).
You would be right if people had a choice of subscribing but many people are forced to accept whatever their employer puts in place.
I think you're missing the point. The subscriber in the corporate scenario is the company, not the employee. Joe