How will this be controlled? BGP community? RADB?

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 6, 2016, at 6:54 PM, Sid Jones <sid.jones@citylink.co.nz> wrote:

Hi Don,

 

Site A will see the IX ASN in routes received from the IX announced by B

 

Site B will not see the IX ASN in the routes received from the IX announced by A

 

There���s one knob for the implementations I���ve looked at

- per client session

-  off or on

 

 

 

On 7/09/16, 12:48, "nznog-bounces@list.waikato.ac.nz on behalf of Don Stokes" <nznog-bounces@list.waikato.ac.nz on behalf of don@daedalus.co.nz> wrote:

 

Hi Tim, Sid,

So can we clarify ... if Site A is "opt out" (i.e. old and busted behaviour, IX ASN inserted) and site B is "opt in" (new hotness behaviour, IX ASN not inserted):

  • Would Site A see the IX ASN inserted in routes announced to the route servers by Site B?
  • Would Site B see the IX ASN inserted in routes announced to the route servers by Site A?

That is, is the ASN inserted into a route's AS path based on where the route comes from, or where it's announced to? Is there more than one setting?

-- don

_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz
https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog