On 3/04/2014, at 7:23 pm, Jonathan Brewer <jon.brewer@gmail.com> wrote:


On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Dave Mill <davemill@gmail.com> wrote:
I've obtained some pcaps from both ends and I can see the following changes occurring to a DHCP Request:

1) The transaction ID is changed
2) Option 82 is added. More specifically, sub-option 1 Agent Circuit ID is present and has a valid length. sub-option 2 Agent Remote ID is present, has a length of 0 and no content which wireshark doesn't seem to like much.

One would not expect an Ethernet service to be giving packets the bad touch.


Agree. To me this seems all wrong. Alarm bells are going off. 



_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog