:: The lacency has alot to do with the Distance between points and :: especially how much cable/type of cable you have to the Antenna. With :: 1-4Km distances you can get around 2-4ms between points :: easily. If you :: are getting 20ms there is something wrong :-) Speed.. Maybe :: 5M at most. :: :: This is about a 1.5Km link :: :: # ping 192.168.123.254 :: PING 192.168.123.254 (192.168.123.254): 56 data bytes :: 64 bytes from 192.168.123.254: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=2.2 ms :: 64 bytes from 192.168.123.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=2.1 ms :: 64 bytes from 192.168.123.254: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=2.1 ms :: 64 bytes from 192.168.123.254: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=2.1 ms :: 64 bytes from 192.168.123.254: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=2.1 ms :: 64 bytes from 192.168.123.254: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=2.1 ms :: 64 bytes from 192.168.123.254: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=2.1 ms Doesn't the encryption add overhead/latency, as Dean seemed to say? -- Juha --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog