1 Nov
2003
1 Nov
'03
8:11 a.m.
On 1 Nov 2003, at 16:56, Philip D'Ath wrote:
I would also be tempted to bump the administrative distance of this right up, to say 254.
ip route 202.6.75.0 255.255.255.0 Null0 254
That's entirely unnecessary, as long as there are more specific routes covered by that /24 in the RIB (and if there aren't, Null0 may well be a reasonable place to send the traffic).