hi,
i don't see too much wrong with INZ - the only concern i (and
some others) had was the lack of geeks in the new proposed council.
this is the reason for some of the later bunch of guys on the election
list for council to stand up and put forward their name.
in my view this is pure counter balance
to a otherwise probably too corporate/governance focused direction of INZ. INZ
is in the lucky position to have two brilliant guys on top of DNCL and
NZRS so that there is not too much oversight needed on that front which
gives resources for extending their work done in things like the new
copyright legislation, software patents and the more internet related
things like being a centre of excellence and expertise in all matters
of internet governance. strengthen the position of INZ as _the_ entity
of consultation for any matters relating to internet governance should
be the biggest goal i think. this would imply that NZ government
officially accepts INZ as the governing body of the .nz namespace and
(hopefully) prevent disasters as we had with s92a.
cheers
lenz
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Drew
Calcott
<drew.calcott@auckland.ac.nz>
wrote:
Steven
Heath wrote:
>
> The first to say it on NZNOG perhaps.
>
Which is exactly my point. I'm guessing quite a few people on here are
in my position and really don't know what is going on with INZ at all...
so it would be nice if people are going to go soliciting votes if they
could spell out what they believe the problems are.
INZ things may not be directly NZNOG related, but the list is currently
dead quiet otherwise, so now that the issue has been raised, how about
you come in for a discussion over a cup of tea, rather than just
standing outside on the lawn holding a sign with your name on it?
--
iWantMyName.com
painless domain registration (finally)
_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog