17 Jun
2001
17 Jun
'01
5:11 a.m.
At 10:05 am +1200 6/18/01, Pete wrote:
I guess what I am getting to - as an end user - is that its the ISP's choice if they want to resolve non-ICANN TLDs, but even if they don't, should they really be "blocking" them via their web-caches?
They won't have a choice soon. IIRC, if they use anything but the "approved" root, ICANN will tell APNIC to re-assign the ISP's IP allotment. -- Andrew P. Gardner barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP? We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare? Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com --------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog