Hi Richard and all,
-----Original Message----- From: Richard Cox [mailto:lists(a)mandarin.co.nz] <snip>
Gordon Smith
commented: Unfortunately there are some in the U.S. that do block all APNIC space, mainly due to the amount of spam originating from China and Korea.
That, plus APNIC's reluctance to accept responsibility for legacy errors in their database.
Well, this is not quite true. APNIC has actually focused a fair bit on
improving data integrity in whois over the last few years. To name a
few:
General improvement of whois data integrity
- Clean up of un-referenced objects
- Removal of objects unrelated to actual resource info (mar-03)
- Removal of resource info not in APNIC range (mar-03)
- Modify records that are not RPSL compliant (mar-03)
- Reduce amount of inaccurate / out of date records
Improving security of whois
- Protection of un-maintained objects (sep-02)
- Deprecation of 'NONE' and 'MAIL-FROM' (sep-02)
- Secure authentication methods (PGP, MD5)
- Stop unauthorised changes of records
Over the last years, the RIRs have coordinated efforts to transfer the
management of early registrations (pre-RIR) from ARIN to the RIR
appropriate to the region in which the resource holders reside
(http://www.apnic.net/db/erx/). This has resulted in an increase of
historical registrations in the APNIC whois over the years - many
which have incomplete contact details. In order to prevent anyone to
go in and modify these records at their whim, APNIC has locked the
records with an APNIC maintainer. We have also implemented processes
to handle updates of historical records in a proper manner.
In addition to this, after endorsement from the community, efforts are
starting this year, to recover unused historical address space. (Many
of the early allocations made are no longer in use and are simply left
in whois with outdated details.) This will also hopfully reduce the
amount of address space hijacking as well as improving the quality of
the data in whois.
Finally, there are efforts to establishing direct relationships with
all resource holders in the APNIC region. This to meet an increased
need for a secure manner to validate resource custodianship (which in
the future could mean issuing of routing certificates). Again, one of
the aims of this apart from clarifying the custodianships is to
improve the integrity of the database for allocations made by the RIR
as well as for historical allocations.
On a general note, it is also worth pointing out that whenever the
APNIC hostmasters are contacted about inaccurate contact details in
the whois database, they try to look for updated contact details and
in some cases contact the resource holders for the correct contact
details. (Although this is somewhat difficult if it is legacy space
with no internal records available.)
If there are other efforts you would like to see APNIC take on, you
are encouraged to voice your opinion on the APNIC mailing list. There
is a Special Interest Group (SIG) that discussed the whois Database
which you can subscribe to here: http://www.apnic.net/community/lists/
You do not have to be an APNIC member to participate in the decision
making process. Anyone in the Internet community can express their
opinion or put forward a proposal.
An archive of all previous policy proposals (including the ones I
mention above) can be found here:
http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/proposals/archive.html
All current proposals are here:
http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/proposals/
We really do welcome some more participation from New Zealand, so I
hope more of you will get involved!
Cheers,
Nurani
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nurani Nimpuno