However the 7210 devices will cost more than Mikrotik…
Jonathon
From: nznog-bounces@list.waikato.ac.nz [mailto:nznog-bounces@list.waikato.ac.nz]
On Behalf Of Rob McDonald
Sent: Thursday, 22 December 2011 10:36 a.m.
To: Anton Smith
Cc: nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz
Subject: Re: [nznog] QinQ box
If your after "cheep cheep" look at Mikrotik Routerboard, they have many different options of CPU vs port density.
I haven't had much trouble with them, I use them everywhere - be wary of crappy wall-wart PSUs that's the only trouble I've had.
Otherwise I'll leave to other people to respond about what other manufacturers would be interested in helping you part with significantly more money. :-)
Cheers
Rob
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Anton Smith <anton@huge.geek.nz> wrote:
Hi all,
Given the handover options from Chorus for UFB (http://www.chorus.co.nz/file/1591), does anybody have any recommendations about a cost effective GE based node that can do QinQ
happily? Port density probably only needs to be 2-4 ports. Control/forwarding redundancy not required.
And, preferably with the capability to set individual policers and/or queue rates on each sub-interface.
I don't know if chorus give you the option to do the rate limiting for you or not - does anybody know?
Cheers,
Anton
_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz
http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
--
Rob McDonald |
Director
Level 2 Systems Ltd
M: +64 21 902 929
eFax: +64 9 974 4734