Peter Mott wrote:
I see ISOCNZ council has thrown out the hine report because it strongly recommended the introduction of a shared registry model for .nz
Not true. The Hine report has generated considerable debate within council, and I know of several other papers that have been generated. The issue currently is "should the paper be adopted as is" or what changes/re-write might be appropriate. I have considerable sympathy with the authors desire not to re-write the report en-mass, given time requirements. At the moment, I am not aware of a conclusion either way. R
Shame on them
Regards
Peter Mott Chief Enthusiast 2day.com -/-
--------- To unsubscribe from nznog, send email to majordomo(a)list.waikato.ac.nz where the body of your message reads: unsubscribe nznog
-- \_ Roger De Salis Cisco Systems NZ Ltd