On 21/05/2010, at 5:16 PM, Alastair Johnson wrote:
Nathan Ward wrote:
Who on produced this report? Can they come to the next NZNOG meeting for a flogging?
From the last page of the report:
"Disclosure Statement from Epitiro The data used in the preparation of this report is provided to the Commission under contractby Epitiro (NZ) Limited, a part of Epitiro, a technology-focused customer experience management and benchmarking company operating world-wide. Epitiro is committed to providing information that is objective, reliable, and unbiased."
I've commented on some of the methodology and assertions made in the past but nothing seems to change with each issue of the report.
Data from Epitiro, sure. Who interpreted it to produce this report though? There is a statement about the lack of peer review in some kind of boilerplate. Why are these sort of documents not peer reviewed? People with more power than us use them to make decisions, this seems really bad. -- Nathan Ward