On 11/04/2007, at 9:10 AM, Andrew Ruthven wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 17:00 +1200, Lin Nah wrote:
b. Content
On the matter of content, what if some other organisations (i.e., Apple or Microsoft) were to make just a portion of their music catalogues freely available over IPv6? (With rate limiting and so on in place of course.)
Wait, what? Why would they put their $ in to that project? What do they gain? In order to bring this in to the realms of beer and operational issues (in order of preference) I'd like to call attention to: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to- historic-00.txt and ask if any of you have given thought to what happens when you can't get any v4 addresses for your subscribers anymore. When thinking about this, keep in mind that until there's a critical mass of IPv6 eyeballs, most content providers are unlikely to spend $ to move. -- Nathan Ward