Is anyone still using bogan lists given that all IPv4 addresses have been allocated to the RIRs?
From the other side of the world - last month I had an issue with my ISP here in Dublin filtering 106/8 (allocated in Jan 2011). Linode's new Tokyo datacenter lives in this range.
Their excuse was that they were simply using the Cisco supplied templates (ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/cons/isp/security/Ingress-Prefix-Filter-Templates) and didn't know any better, after haranguing them for several days it got fixed, but I note the templates on Cisco's FTP site still haven't been updated.
That's quite bad. It's several months out of date and has plenty of allocated addresses listed as bogons. If it's any use, draft-ietf-grow-no-more-unallocated-slash8s was approved yesterday. Once it has been processed by the RFC Editor it might help convince the stragglers to fix their filter policies. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-no-more-unallocated-slash8s/... Regards, Leo