On 2013-11-06, at 16:16, Jeremy Visser
On 6/11/2013 10:26, Matt Richards wrote:
perhaps you need the new space to host a bunch of HTTPS web sites, which don't currently exist?
With Windows XP due to be EOL'ed in April 2014 (less than 6 months away), and market share at 31% and falling, [0] is HTTPS *still* a justifiable reason to be hoarding IPv4 space?
(No.)
I think the useful advice for people on this list concerns the intersection between operations and existing policy. You seem to be talking about an opinion about what future policy should look like. It almost feels like you're confused nznog with an APNIC policy list. Full marks for the .name domain though! Yours is only the second I've ever actually seen used by someone (the other one is on the business card of a Canadian magician that I keep proudly displayed as a rare artefact on my desk). Joe