*ahem* Carry on, nothing to see here. On 15/10/2008, at 2:57 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
Nathan, Section 6.2 explains it for DSL.
MMC
On 15/10/2008, at 12:24 PM, Nathan Ward wrote:
On 15/10/2008, at 2:33 PM, Andrew Ruthven wrote:
G'day,
Thank you to the people letting us (and me via private email) know who does and doesn't provide static IPs, but can anyone point me towards this mystical APNIC policy?
Or we safely assume that there is no such policy?
http://www.apnic.net/policy/ipv4-guidelines.html#6.1
"For services that are intended to connect the Internet on a transient basis (for example, dial-up connections), best current practice is to use a pool of IP addresses for dynamic addressing as connections are made.
If an organisation plans to make static assignments to transient connections, then full technical justification will be required to support the request."
"Because my customers require static IP addressing for applications they use."
Or, you could say that ADSL these days is not transient.
-- Nathan Ward
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
-- Matthew Moyle-Croft Internode/Agile Peering and Core Networks Level 4, 150 Grenfell Street, Adelaide, SA 5000 Australia Email: mmc(a)internode.com.au Web: http://www.on.net Direct: +61-8-8228-2909 Mobile: +61-419-900-366 Reception: +61-8-8228-2999 Fax: +61-8-8235-6909
!DSPAM:22,48f54e21202912129119219!
-- Nathan Ward