On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Rowan Smith wrote:
I'd agree with using ISOCNZ for this sort of thing. I think that is what it is there for.
I have no arguments with this. However, we do seem to be arguing about
something that is rather unlikely to be needed anyway - all inter-provider
routing fiascos to date have been sorted out quite nicely without anybody
needing to call the Net Police, and I don't really see that policy entries
in whichever rr is used really present anything new in that regard.
Good to see everybody again at the pub last night, by the way - we should
definitely do that more often.
Last, (and least :) - it was (b). My message just came back with no
Reply-To header.
Joe
--
Joe Abley