IPnet did this from day one, it's ugly but who really cares, it has no operational impact. 10.65.... hmmm Juniper M160... :-) Jonathan Brewer wrote:
Hi Folks,
I am wondering about the etiquette of reporting RFC1918 addresses back to hosts performing a traceroute. Example below:
Hostname 1. ourhost.ourprovider.net.nz 2. f3-0-2.core1.wlg.ourprovider.net.nz 3. f0-0-4.core3.wlg.ourprovider.net.nz 4. f4-0-5.core2.akl.ourprovider.net.nz 5. g1-0-1396.u12.brfd.otherprovider.net.nz 6. g1-0-1043.u12.brh.otherprovider.net.nz 7. 10.65.32.1 8. 10.65.32.250 9. 10.69.0.2 10. a12-3-23.u21.tar.otherprovider.net.nz 11. fa7-4-1042.bigrouter.otherprovider.net.nz 12. otherhost.otherprovider.net.nz
Any comments on this practice?
Cheers,
Jon
------------------------------------ Araneo Limited info (at) araneo.net.nz 5th Floor Central House 26 Brandon Street Wellington, New Zealand tel: +64-4-473-3932 fax: +64-4-472-0960 http://www.araneo.net.nz ------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG(a)list.waikato.ac.nz http://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog